Literature DB >> 19629814

A new approach to children's footwear based on foot type classification.

M Mauch1, S Grau, I Krauss, C Maiwald, T Horstmann.   

Abstract

Current shoe designs do not allow for the comprehensive 3-D foot shape, which means they are unable to reproduce the wide variability in foot morphology. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to capture these variations of children's feet by classifying them into groups (types) and thereby provide a basis for their implementation in the design of children's shoes. The feet of 2867 German children were measured using a 3-D foot scanner. Cluster analysis was then applied to classify the feet into three different foot types. The characteristics of these foot types differ regarding their volume and forefoot shape both within and between shoe sizes. This new approach is in clear contrast to previous systems, since it captures the variability of foot morphology in a more comprehensive way by using a foot typing system and therefore paves the way for the unimpaired development of children's feet. Previous shoe systems do not allow for the wide variations in foot morphology. A new approach was developed regarding different morphological foot types based on 3-D measurements relevant in shoe construction. This can be directly applied to create specific designs for children's shoes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19629814     DOI: 10.1080/00140130902803549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  16 in total

1.  The use of 3D surface scanning for the measurement and assessment of the human foot.

Authors:  Scott Telfer; James Woodburn
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-09-05       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Foot morphology in normal-weight, overweight, and obese schoolchildren.

Authors:  Ester Jiménez-Ormeño; Xavier Aguado; Laura Delgado-Abellán; Laura Mecerreyes; Luis M Alegre
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners.

Authors:  Yang Shu; Qichang Mei; Justin Fernandez; Zhiyong Li; Neng Feng; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Geometric morphometric footprint analysis of young women.

Authors:  Jacqueline Domjanic; Martin Fieder; Horst Seidler; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Influence of footwear fitting on feet morphology in 9 year old girls.

Authors:  Ewa Puszczalowska-Lizis; Paulina Zarzyczna; Wioletta Mikulakova; Mariusz Migala; Slawomir Jandzis
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Environmental Factors as a Cause of Differences in the Feet of Ecuadorian Children and Its Relation to Their Footwear.

Authors:  Laura Martin-Casado; Christian Barquín; Alberto Aldana-Caballero; Felix Marcos-Tejedor; Xavier Aguado
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31

7.  The Principal Components of Adult Female Insole Shape Align Closely with Two of Its Classic Indicators.

Authors:  Fred L Bookstein; Jacqueline Domjanic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of healthy foot shape: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Kristina Stanković; Brian G Booth; Femke Danckaers; Fien Burg; Philippe Vermaelen; Saartje Duerinck; Jan Sijbers; Toon Huysmans
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Foot Morphology in Chinese School Children Varies by Sex and Age.

Authors:  Miaomiao Xu; Youlian Hong; Jing Xian Li; Lin Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-07-01

10.  Children should be seen and also heard: an explorative qualitative study into the influences on children's choice of footwear, their perception of comfort and the language they use to describe footwear experiences.

Authors:  Carina Price; Sue Skidmore; Jane Ratcliffe; Anita Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.