Literature DB >> 19629680

Tumor marker phenotype concordance in second primary breast cancer, California, 1999-2004.

Monica Brown1, Katrina Bauer, Mary Pare.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. It is estimated that 7% of women who have breast cancer will develop a subsequent second independent breast tumor within 10 years of the first. The status of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and human growth hormone (HER2) receptors, individually and as phenotypic combinations, impacts the clinical course of breast cancer and may impact the course of subsequent primary tumors and patient survival. Our aims were to determine tumor marker phenotype concordance between first and second primary breast cancers (FPBC and SPBC), describe demographic and clinical characteristics, and examine first tumor treatments associated with phenotype concordance. A total of 76,209 cases of female invasive breast cancer were identified in the California Cancer Registry from 1999 to 2004. Of those, 1,407 women who had not undergone a prophylactic mastectomy, had information on the status of three tumor markers, and were diagnosed with an SPBC during the study period were selected. SPBCs were significantly smaller, diagnosed at a higher stage and were node positive. Patients whose FPBC was ER(+)/-/PR(+)/-/HER2- and triple negative (TN) (ER-/PR-/HER2-), often had concordant phenotypes for their SPBC. ER(+)/-/PR(+)/-/HER2+ and HER2-positive (ER-/PR-/HER2+) FPBCs, often had discordant phenotypes for their SPBC. ER(+)/-/PR(+)/-/HER2- SPBCs often lacked HER2 expression and were ER and/or PR positive. Tumor laterality and synchronicity significantly predicted concordance as did having a FPBC whose phenotypes were ER(+)/-/PR(+)/-/HER2+, HER2-positive and TN, while first primary tumor treatment with chemotherapy predicted discordance. The relationship between multiple primary breast cancer phenotype concordance and patient prognosis has yet to be determined. Our results indicate that SPBC surveillance strategies include consideration of FPBC phenotype. Although our results are provocative, they may have been influenced by current criteria used to determine tumor independence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19629680     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0469-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  8 in total

Review 1.  Etiologic field effect: reappraisal of the field effect concept in cancer predisposition and progression.

Authors:  Paul Lochhead; Andrew T Chan; Reiko Nishihara; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew H Beck; Edward Giovannucci; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Adaptive changes result in activation of alternate signaling pathways and acquisition of resistance to aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Angela Brodie; Gauri Sabnis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Evidence for Etiologic Subtypes of Breast Cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Halei C Benefield; Emily C Zabor; Yue Shan; Emma H Allott; Colin B Begg; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Heterogeneity in hormone-receptor status and survival outcomes among women with synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancers.

Authors:  Zora Baretta; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Risk of a second breast cancer associated with hormone-receptor and HER2/neu status of the first breast cancer.

Authors:  Leona Bessonova; Thomas H Taylor; Rita S Mehta; Jason A Zell; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  A strategy for distinguishing optimal cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Colin B Begg
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Comparison of hormonal receptor and HER-2 status between breast primary tumours and relapsing tumours: clinical implications of progesterone receptor loss.

Authors:  Giuseppe Bogina; Laura Bortesi; Marcella Marconi; Marco Venturini; Gianluigi Lunardi; Francesca Coati; Alberto Massocco; Erminia Manfrin; Cristina Pegoraro; Giuseppe Zamboni
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Major Functional Transcriptome of an Inferred Center Regulator of an ER(-) Breast Cancer Model System.

Authors:  Li-Yu Daisy Liu; Li-Yun Chang; Wen-Hung Kuo; Hsiao-Lin Hwa; Yi-Shing Lin; Shiu-Feng Huang; Chiung-Nien Chen; King-Jen Chang; Fon-Jou Hsieh
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2012-04-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.