PURPOSE: For International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stages III or IV neuroblastoma (intermediate or high risk), complete excision of the primary tumor is not always feasible. Most current studies on the treatment outcome of these patients have reported on the complete excision status. The aim of this study is to review the treatment outcome after the incomplete resection. METHODS: The medical records of 37 patients that underwent incomplete resection between January 1986 and December 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. Incomplete resection was assessed by review of the operative notes and postoperative computerized tomography. Age, gender, tumor location, INSS stage, N-myc gene copy number, pre- and postoperative therapy, and treatment outcome were reviewed. The treatment outcome was evaluated according to the postoperative treatment protocol in the high-risk group. RESULTS: Intermediate-risk patients were treated with conventional chemotherapy, isotretinoin (ITT) and interleukin-2 (IL-2). High-risk patients were treated with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), ITT, and IL-2 (N = 11). Before the introduction of PBSCT, the high-risk patients were also treated with the conventional chemotherapy (N = 19). Intermediate-risk patients (N = 5) currently have no evidence of disease (NED). For the high-risk patients (N = 32), 19 patients were treated with chemotherapy alone; 15 patients died of their disease while four patients currently have an NED status. Eight of 11 patients that underwent PBSCT are currently alive. CONCLUSIONS: For intermediate risk, conventional chemotherapy appears to be acceptable treatment. However, for high-risk patients, every effort should be made to control residual disease including the use of myeloablative chemotherapy, differentiating agents and immune-modulating agents.
PURPOSE: For International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stages III or IV neuroblastoma (intermediate or high risk), complete excision of the primary tumor is not always feasible. Most current studies on the treatment outcome of these patients have reported on the complete excision status. The aim of this study is to review the treatment outcome after the incomplete resection. METHODS: The medical records of 37 patients that underwent incomplete resection between January 1986 and December 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. Incomplete resection was assessed by review of the operative notes and postoperative computerized tomography. Age, gender, tumor location, INSS stage, N-myc gene copy number, pre- and postoperative therapy, and treatment outcome were reviewed. The treatment outcome was evaluated according to the postoperative treatment protocol in the high-risk group. RESULTS: Intermediate-risk patients were treated with conventional chemotherapy, isotretinoin (ITT) and interleukin-2 (IL-2). High-risk patients were treated with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), ITT, and IL-2 (N = 11). Before the introduction of PBSCT, the high-risk patients were also treated with the conventional chemotherapy (N = 19). Intermediate-risk patients (N = 5) currently have no evidence of disease (NED). For the high-risk patients (N = 32), 19 patients were treated with chemotherapy alone; 15 patients died of their disease while four patients currently have an NED status. Eight of 11 patients that underwent PBSCT are currently alive. CONCLUSIONS: For intermediate risk, conventional chemotherapy appears to be acceptable treatment. However, for high-risk patients, every effort should be made to control residual disease including the use of myeloablative chemotherapy, differentiating agents and immune-modulating agents.
Authors: K K Matthay; C Perez; R C Seeger; G M Brodeur; H Shimada; J B Atkinson; C T Black; R Gerbing; G M Haase; D O Stram; P Swift; J N Lukens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Victoria Castel; J A Tovar; E Costa; J Cuadros; A Ruiz; V Rollan; J I Ruiz-Jimenez; R Perez-Hernández; A Cañete Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Rani E George; Shuli Li; Cheryl Medeiros-Nancarrow; Donna Neuberg; Karen Marcus; Robert C Shamberger; Michael Pulsipher; Stephan A Grupp; Lisa Diller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R Ladenstein; T Philip; C Lasset; O Hartmann; A Garaventa; R Pinkerton; J Michon; J Pritchard; T Klingebiel; B Kremens; A Pearson; C Coze; P Paolucci; D Frappaz; H Gadner; F Chauvin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Katherine K Matthay; C Patrick Reynolds; Robert C Seeger; Hiroyuki Shimada; E Stanton Adkins; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Robert B Gerbing; Wendy B London; Judith G Villablanca Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael P La Quaglia; Brian H Kushner; Wendy Su; Glenn Heller; Kim Kramer; Sara Abramson; Nancy Rosen; Suzanne Wolden; Nai-Kong V Cheung Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Emily R Christison-Lagay; David G Darcy; Eric J Stanelle; Stacy Dasilva; Edward Avila; Michael P La Quaglia Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 2.545