INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine age-, hormone-, and sex-dependent differences to the behavioral effects of nicotine using place-conditioning procedures in female rats. METHODS: Animals received nicotine in their initially non-preferred side and saline on alternate days in their initially preferred side. Following four conditioning trials, rats were re-tested for their preference. To examine developmental differences, we compared the effects of various nicotine doses in female and male adolescent and adult rats. To examine whether our developmental differences are specific to nicotine, we included adolescent and adult females that were conditioned with various amphetamine doses. To examine the influence of hormones on the behavioral effects of nicotine, we compared the effects of various nicotine doses in intact females that were tested during different phases of the estrous cycle and in separate females that were ovariectomized. RESULTS: The rewarding effects of nicotine were observed at a lower nicotine dose in adolescents versus adults. Amphetamine produced similar rewarding effects across age groups in females. The shifts in preference produced by nicotine were similar across the different phases of estrous. Females lacking ovarian hormones did not display rewarding effects of nicotine at any dose. The rewarding effects of nicotine were enhanced in adult female versus male rats. An intermediate nicotine dose produced rewarding effects in adolescent male but not female rats, suggesting that developmental differences to nicotine may be enhanced in males. CONCLUSION: In females, nicotine reward is enhanced during adolescence and is facilitated by the presence of ovarian hormones.
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to examine age-, hormone-, and sex-dependent differences to the behavioral effects of nicotine using place-conditioning procedures in female rats. METHODS: Animals received nicotine in their initially non-preferred side and saline on alternate days in their initially preferred side. Following four conditioning trials, rats were re-tested for their preference. To examine developmental differences, we compared the effects of various nicotine doses in female and male adolescent and adult rats. To examine whether our developmental differences are specific to nicotine, we included adolescent and adult females that were conditioned with various amphetamine doses. To examine the influence of hormones on the behavioral effects of nicotine, we compared the effects of various nicotine doses in intact females that were tested during different phases of the estrous cycle and in separate females that were ovariectomized. RESULTS: The rewarding effects of nicotine were observed at a lower nicotine dose in adolescents versus adults. Amphetamine produced similar rewarding effects across age groups in females. The shifts in preference produced by nicotine were similar across the different phases of estrous. Females lacking ovarian hormones did not display rewarding effects of nicotine at any dose. The rewarding effects of nicotine were enhanced in adult female versus male rats. An intermediate nicotine dose produced rewarding effects in adolescent male but not female rats, suggesting that developmental differences to nicotine may be enhanced in males. CONCLUSION: In females, nicotine reward is enhanced during adolescence and is facilitated by the presence of ovarian hormones.
Authors: A R Caggiula; E C Donny; A R White; N Chaudhri; S Booth; M A Gharib; A Hoffman; K A Perkins; A F Sved Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: E C Donny; A R Caggiula; P P Rowell; M A Gharib; V Maldovan; S Booth; M M Mielke; A Hoffman; S McCallum Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Ryan M Bastle; Natalie A Peartree; Julianna Goenaga; Kayla N Hatch; Angela Henricks; Samantha Scott; Lauren E Hood; Janet L Neisewander Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Angela M Lee; Cali A Calarco; Sherry A McKee; Yann S Mineur; Marina R Picciotto Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Rodolfo J Flores; Joseph A Pipkin; Kevin P Uribe; Adriana Perez; Laura E O'Dell Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; Robert Urman; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Nicholas I Goldenson; Katia Gallegos; Chih Ping Chou; Kejia Wang; Kiros Berhane; Tess Boley Cruz; Mary Ann Pentz; Jennifer Unger; Rob S McConnell Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Oscar V Torres; Joseph A Pipkin; Patrick Ferree; Luis M Carcoba; Laura E O'Dell Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea H Weinberger; Philip H Smith; Sharon S Allen; Kelly P Cosgrove; Michael E Saladin; Kevin M Gray; Carolyn M Mazure; Cora Lee Wetherington; Sherry A McKee Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.244