Literature DB >> 19628438

Height, wealth, and health: an overview with new data from three longitudinal studies.

G David Batty1, Martin J Shipley, David Gunnell, Rachel Huxley, Mika Kivimaki, Mark Woodward, Crystal Man Ying Lee, George Davey Smith.   

Abstract

This overview, based on a literature review and new data from the three cohorts (Whitehall Studies I and II, and the Vietnam Experience Study), has four objectives: (a) to outline the major determinants of height, so providing an indication as to what exposures this characteristic may capture; (b) to summarise, by reviewing reports from large scale studies, the relation between adult height and a range of disease outcomes--both somatic and psychiatric--with particular emphasis on coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke; (c) to discuss why these relationships may exist, in particular, the role, if any, of socioeconomic position in explaining the apparent associations; and, finally (d) to outline future research directions in this field. The large majority of evidence for predictors of height, and its health consequences, comes from observational studies. While genetic predisposition is a major determinant of height, secular rises in childhood and adult stature across successive birth cohorts suggest that early life environment also has an important impact. Plausible non-genetic determinants of height include nutrition, illness, socioeconomic status, and psychosocial stress. Evidence for an association between height and a series of health endpoints is accumulating. Thus, shorter people appear to experience increased risk of CHD, and these associations appear to be independent of socioeconomic position and other potentially confounding variables. For stroke, and its sub-types, findings are less clear. In contrast to CHD, some cancers, such as carcinoma of the colorectum, prostate, breast (in women), central nervous system, skin, endometrium, thyroid and blood (haematopoietic) are more common in taller people. While height may be negatively related to the risk of completed suicide, conclusions about the links between stature and other health endpoints is problematic given the paucity of evidence, which should be addressed. Ultimately, for want of better data, investigators in this area have used height as a proxy for a range of pre-adult exposures. In future, research should aim to explore the predictive capacity of direct measures of diet, psychosocial stress, childhood chronic illness and so on, rather than focus on height or its components. The problem is that extended follow-up of child cohorts with such data are required, and studies which hold these data are not currently available, although several are either maturing to the point where they offer sufficient clinical outcomes to facilitate analyses or are in the advanced planning stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19628438     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2009.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econ Hum Biol        ISSN: 1570-677X            Impact factor:   2.184


  87 in total

1.  Effects of prenatal care on child health at age 5.

Authors:  Kelly Noonan; Hope Corman; Ofira Schwartz-Soicher; Nancy E Reichman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-02

2.  Does adult height predict later mortality?: Comparative evidence from the Early Indicators samples in the United States.

Authors:  Sven E Wilson
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.184

3.  Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Reduce Longitudinal Growth in Risperidone-Treated Boys.

Authors:  Chadi A Calarge; James A Mills; Lefkothea Karaviti; Antonio L Teixeira; Babette S Zemel; Jose M Garcia
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Height as an independent anthropomorphic risk factor for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ben Boursi; Kevin Haynes; Ronac Mamtani; Yu-Xiao Yang
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Clinical and genetic characterization of pituitary gigantism: an international collaborative study in 208 patients.

Authors:  Liliya Rostomyan; Adrian F Daly; Patrick Petrossians; Emil Nachev; Anurag R Lila; Anne-Lise Lecoq; Beatriz Lecumberri; Giampaolo Trivellin; Roberto Salvatori; Andreas G Moraitis; Ian Holdaway; Dianne J Kranenburg-van Klaveren; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Nuria Palacios; Cecile Nozieres; Margaret Zacharin; Tapani Ebeling; Marja Ojaniemi; Liudmila Rozhinskaya; Elisa Verrua; Marie-Lise Jaffrain-Rea; Silvia Filipponi; Daria Gusakova; Vyacheslav Pronin; Jerome Bertherat; Zhanna Belaya; Irena Ilovayskaya; Mona Sahnoun-Fathallah; Caroline Sievers; Gunter K Stalla; Emilie Castermans; Jean-Hubert Caberg; Ekaterina Sorkina; Renata Simona Auriemma; Sachin Mittal; Maria Kareva; Philippe A Lysy; Philippe Emy; Ernesto De Menis; Catherine S Choong; Giovanna Mantovani; Vincent Bours; Wouter De Herder; Thierry Brue; Anne Barlier; Sebastian J C M M Neggers; Sabina Zacharieva; Philippe Chanson; Nalini Samir Shah; Constantine A Stratakis; Luciana A Naves; Albert Beckers
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 5.678

6.  Body size in early life and breast cancer risk in African American and European American women.

Authors:  Elisa V Bandera; Urmila Chandran; Gary Zirpoli; Gregory Ciupak; Dana H Bovbjerg; Lina Jandorf; Karen Pawlish; Jo L Freudenheim; Christine B Ambrosone
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Body height and immune efficacy: testing body stature as a signal of biological quality.

Authors:  Bogusław Pawłowski; Judyta Nowak; Barbara Borkowska; Daria Augustyniak; Zuzanna Drulis-Kawa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Recent advances in understanding the long-term sequelae of childhood infectious diarrhea.

Authors:  Rebecca J Scharf; Mark D Deboer; Richard L Guerrant
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Differences in height by education among 371,105 Dutch military conscripts.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Frans van Poppel; L H Lumey
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.184

10.  Gene × environment interaction by a longitudinal epigenome-wide association study (LEWAS) overcomes limitations of genome-wide association study (GWAS).

Authors:  Debomoy K Lahiri; Bryan Maloney
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.