Literature DB >> 19628361

Validation of the PIII CLI risk score for the prediction of amputation-free survival in patients undergoing infrainguinal autogenous vein bypass for critical limb ischemia.

Andres Schanzer1, Philip P Goodney, Youfu Li, Mohammad Eslami, Jack Cronenwett, Louis Messina, Michael S Conte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The PREVENT III (PIII) critical limb ischemia (CLI) risk score is a simple, published tool derived from the PIII randomized clinical trial that can be used for estimating amputation-free survival (AFS) in CLI patients considered for infrainguinal bypass (IB). The current study sought to validate this risk stratification model using data from the prospectively collected Vascular Study Group of Northern New England (VSGNNE).
METHOD: We calculated the PIII CLI risk score for 1166 patients undergoing IB with autogenous vein by 59 surgeons at 11 hospitals between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2007. Points (pts) were assigned to each patient for the presence of dialysis (4 pts), tissue loss (3 pts), age >or=75 (2 pts), and coronary artery disease (CAD) (1 pt). Baseline hematocrit was not included due to a large proportion of missing values. Total scores were used to stratify each patient into low-risk (<or=3 pts), med-risk (4-7 pts), and high-risk (>or=8 pts) categories. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate AFS for the three risk groups. Log-rank test was used for intergroup comparisons. To assess validation, comparison to the PIII derivation and validation sets was performed. RESULT: Stratification of the VSGNNE patients by risk category yielded three significantly different estimates for 1-year AFS (86.4%, 74.0%, and 56.1%, for low-, med-, and high-risk groups). Intergroup comparison demonstrated precise discrimination (P < .0001). For a given risk category (low, med, or high), the 1-year AFS estimates in the VSGNNE dataset were consistent with those observed in the previously published PIII derivation set (85.9%, 73.0%, and 44.6%, respectively), PIII validation set (87.7%, 63.7%, and 45.0%, respectively), and retrospective multicenter validation set (86.3%, 70.1%, and 47.8%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The PIII CLI risk score has now been both internally and externally validated by testing it against the outcomes of 3286 CLI patients who underwent autogenous vein bypass at 94 institutions by a diverse array of physicians (three independent cohorts of patients). This tool provides a simple and reliable method to risk stratify CLI patients being considered for IB. At initial consultation, calculation of the PIII CLI risk score can reliably stratify patients according to their risk of death or major amputation at 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19628361     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.05.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  13 in total

1.  Failure to achieve clinical improvement despite graft patency in patients undergoing infrainguinal lower extremity bypass for critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Jessica P Simons; Philip P Goodney; Brian W Nolan; Jack L Cronenwett; Louis M Messina; Andres Schanzer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Variation in the use of lower extremity vascular procedures for critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Lori L Travis; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Kerianne Holman; Bjoern Suckow; Peter K Henke; F Lee Lucas; David C Goodman; John D Birkmeyer; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-12-06

Review 3.  Critical limb ischemia: reporting outcomes and quality.

Authors:  Mark G Davies
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

4.  Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of mortality after infrainguinal bypass surgery.

Authors:  Prateek K Gupta; Bala Ramanan; Thomas G Lynch; Abhishek Sundaram; Jason N MacTaggart; Himani Gupta; Xiang Fang; Iraklis I Pipinos
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Population-Based Trends in Amputations and Revascularizations for Peripheral Artery Disease From 1990 to 2009.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Nienaber; Carin Y Smith; Stephen Cha; Mateus Correa; Phillip G Rowse; Kent R Bailey; Manju Kalra
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 11.104

6.  Critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Andres Schanzer; Michael S Conte
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-04-14

7.  Determinants of survival and major amputation after peripheral endovascular intervention for critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Luke Vierthaler; Peter W Callas; Philip P Goodney; Andres Schanzer; Virenda I Patel; Jack Cronenwett; Daniel J Bertges
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  A comparative evaluation of risk-adjustment models for benchmarking amputation-free survival after lower extremity bypass.

Authors:  Jessica P Simons; Philip P Goodney; Julie Flahive; Andrew W Hoel; John W Hallett; Larry W Kraiss; Andres Schanzer
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Building a Critical Limb Ischemia Program.

Authors:  Andrew M Galmer; Samy M Selim; Jay Giri; Joe F Lau; Mitchell D Weinberg
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-08

10.  Collective therapy and therapeutic strategy for critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Hisao Masaki; Atushi Tabuchi; Yasuhiro Yunoki; Hiroshi Kubo; Kosaku Nishikawa; Hiroki Yakiuchi; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2013-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.