PURPOSE: Self-reports are the standard measure of STD history used in survey research. We explored to what extent self-reports of ever having an STD are recanted in a follow-up data collection. METHODS: Using the National Survey of Adolescent Males (NSAM), we assessed consistency over time in self-reports of ever having an STD in a sample of young men transitioning from adolescence to young adulthood (aged 15-26 years), a population in which STDs are particularly prevalent. RESULTS: Approximately 7% of all sexually experienced young men rescinded STD self-reports over time. Thus, self-reports at one point in time likely underestimate true STD history, using earlier self-reports as the criterion. Among men who ever report an STD, 94-98% recant their reports in later waves. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the extent of underreporting can potentially be used to adjust cross-sectional estimates of STDs based on survey self-reports. These study findings move us one step closer to estimating just how much underreporting of STDs in self-reports is.
PURPOSE: Self-reports are the standard measure of STD history used in survey research. We explored to what extent self-reports of ever having an STD are recanted in a follow-up data collection. METHODS: Using the National Survey of Adolescent Males (NSAM), we assessed consistency over time in self-reports of ever having an STD in a sample of young men transitioning from adolescence to young adulthood (aged 15-26 years), a population in which STDs are particularly prevalent. RESULTS: Approximately 7% of all sexually experienced young men rescinded STD self-reports over time. Thus, self-reports at one point in time likely underestimate true STD history, using earlier self-reports as the criterion. Among men who ever report an STD, 94-98% recant their reports in later waves. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the extent of underreporting can potentially be used to adjust cross-sectional estimates of STDs based on survey self-reports. These study findings move us one step closer to estimating just how much underreporting of STDs in self-reports is.
Authors: K F Harrington; R J DiClemente; G M Wingood; R A Crosby; S Person; M K Oh; E W Hook Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Christopher M Fleming; Nicole Eisenberg; Richard F Catalano; Rick Kosterman; Christopher Cambron; J David Hawkins; Tim Hobbs; Ilene Berman; Tammi Fleming; Jessie Watrous Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2019-07
Authors: Ann C Frisse; Jeanne M Marrazzo; Nhial T Tutlam; Courtney A Schreiber; Stephanie B Teal; David K Turok; Jeffrey F Peipert Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Kevon-Mark P Jackman; Sarah Murray; Lisa Hightow-Weidman; Maria E Trent; Andrea L Wirtz; Stefan D Baral; Jacky M Jennings Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eric R Buhi; Natalie Klinkenberger; Mary McFarlane; Rachel Kachur; Ellen M Daley; Julie Baldwin; Heather D Blunt; Shana Hughes; Christopher W Wheldon; Cornelis Rietmeijer Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Kevon-Mark Jackman; Derek T Dangerfield; Cui Yang; Maria Trent; Hadi Kharrazi; Renee M Johnson; Carl Latkin Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-11-13