Literature DB >> 19628098

Recent trends in bariatric surgery case volume in the United States.

Geoffrey P Kohn1, Joseph A Galanko, D Wayne Overby, Timothy M Farrell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports of increasing bariatric surgery volumes have driven resource allocation by health care systems and device manufacturers. Professional organizations and third-party payers have embraced credentialing systems to limit frivolous expansion. The underlying data upon which these reports are based are disparate and derived from imperfect methodologies. We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) using several established search strategies to validate the current understanding of bariatric trends.
METHODS: NIS search algorithms capture bariatric admissions by the presence of International Classification of Disease, Ninth-Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for obesity and bariatric procedures, with varying levels of inclusiveness for related foregut procedure codes. We applied 1 novel and 4 established algorithms to NIS data sets from 1998 to 2006 to generate contemporary case-volume curves, and we supplemented our data with industry estimates of ambulatory surgery volumes.
RESULTS: From 1998 to 2003, the number of bariatric operations increased markedly by all search strategies. Since then, a greater variation was observed in case volume estimates but no evidence of continuing growth was identified, irrespective of the search protocol employed.
CONCLUSION: Bariatric procedures peaked in 2003 and have since plateaued. The estimation of case volumes is limited by deficiencies in data and nonuniform search criteria. These factors should be considered by surgeons, professional organizations, hospitals, and third-party payers when planning for the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19628098     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  27 in total

1.  Sociodemographic trends in bariatric surgery utilization in the USA.

Authors:  O E Pickett-Blakely; M M Huizinga; J M Clark
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  The effect of surgical volume and the provision of residency and fellowship training on complications of major hepatic resection.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Mehrdad Nikfarjam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Gastrojejunal stoma diameter predicts weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Barham K Abu Dayyeh; David B Lautz; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  National trends in esophageal surgery--are outcomes as good as we believe?

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Joseph Anton Galanko; Michael Owen Meyers; Richard Harry Feins; Timothy Michael Farrell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Concomitant cholecystectomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in obese patients is not justified: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Ignazio Tarantino; Kristjan Ukegjini; Ulrich Beutner; Ulrich Güller; Bruno M Schmied; Sascha A Müller; Bernd Schultes; Martin Thurnheer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Incontinence: an underappreciated problem in obesity and bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Endoscopic sclerotherapy for the treatment of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: outcomes, complications, and predictors of response in 575 procedures.

Authors:  Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Zachary Weitzner; Charlotte Barker; Michael S Flicker; David B Lautz; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Concomitant cholecystectomy during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Asnat Raziel; Nasser Sakran; Amir Szold; David Goitein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotically assisted revision of bariatric surgeries is safe and effective to achieve further weight loss.

Authors:  Brad Snyder; Todd Wilson; Vicky Woodruff; Erik Wilson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The impact of accreditation on safety and cost of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Bruce Wang; Edwin Wong; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Sean D Sullivan; David R Flum
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.734

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.