Literature DB >> 19628022

Probabilistic reversal learning is impaired in Parkinson's disease.

D A Peterson1, C Elliott, D D Song, S Makeig, T J Sejnowski, H Poizner.   

Abstract

In many everyday settings, the relationship between our choices and their potentially rewarding outcomes is probabilistic and dynamic. In addition, the difficulty of the choices can vary widely. Although a large body of theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that dopamine mediates rewarded learning, the influence of dopamine in probabilistic and dynamic rewarded learning remains unclear. We adapted a probabilistic rewarded learning task originally used to study firing rates of dopamine cells in primate substantia nigra pars compacta [Morris G, Nevet A, Arkadir D, Vaadia E, Bergman H (2006) Midbrain dopamine neurons encode decisions for future action. Nat Neurosci 9:1057-1063] for use as a reversal learning task with humans. We sought to investigate how the dopamine depletion in Parkinson's disease (PD) affects probabilistic reward learning and adaptation to a reversal in reward contingencies. Over the course of 256 trials subjects learned to choose the more favorable from among pairs of images with small or large differences in reward probabilities. During a subsequent otherwise identical reversal phase, the reward probability contingencies for the stimuli were reversed. Seventeen PD patients of mild to moderate severity were studied off of their dopaminergic medications and compared to 15 age-matched controls. Compared to controls, PD patients had distinct pre- and post-reversal deficiencies depending upon the difficulty of the choices they had to learn. The patients also exhibited compromised adaptability to the reversal. A computational model of the subjects' trial-by-trial choices demonstrated that the adaptability was sensitive to the gain with which patients weighted pre-reversal feedback. Collectively, the results implicate the nigral dopaminergic system in learning to make choices in environments with probabilistic and dynamic reward contingencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19628022      PMCID: PMC2760640          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  36 in total

Review 1.  Basal ganglia and dopamine contributions to probabilistic category learning.

Authors:  D Shohamy; C E Myers; J Kalanithi; M A Gluck
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  A computational model of risk, conflict, and individual difference effects in the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Joshua W Brown; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Individual differences and the neural representations of reward expectation and reward prediction error.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  A computational model of how the basal ganglia produce sequences.

Authors:  G S Berns; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Reversal learning in Parkinson's disease depends on medication status and outcome valence.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Lee Altamirano; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Reward mechanisms in the brain and their role in dependence: evidence from neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  C Martin-Soelch; K L Leenders; A F Chevalley; J Missimer; G Künig; S Magyar; A Mino; W Schultz
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-10

7.  Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality.

Authors:  M M Hoehn; M D Yahr
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Procedural motor learning in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  H I Krebs; N Hogan; W Hening; S V Adamovich; H Poizner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Learning the value of information in an uncertain world.

Authors:  Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Mark E Walton; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  L-DOPA disrupts activity in the nucleus accumbens during reversal learning in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Simon J G Lewis; Luke Clark; Roger A Barker; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Reward-related learning via multiple memory systems.

Authors:  Mauricio R Delgado; Kathryn C Dickerson
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Locomotor differences in mice expressing wild-type human α-synuclein.

Authors:  Genesys Giraldo; Mieu Brooks; Benoit I Giasson; Christopher Janus
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Maladaptive avoidance patterns in Parkinson's disease are exacerbated by symptoms of depression.

Authors:  Jony Sheynin; Irina Baetu; Lyndsey E Collins-Praino; Catherine E Myers; Robyn Winwood-Smith; Ahmed A Moustafa
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Roles of centromedian parafascicular nuclei of thalamus and cholinergic interneurons in the dorsal striatum in associative learning of environmental events.

Authors:  Ko Yamanaka; Yukiko Hori; Takafumi Minamimoto; Hiroshi Yamada; Naoyuki Matsumoto; Kazuki Enomoto; Toshihiko Aosaki; Ann M Graybiel; Minoru Kimura
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Partial lesion of the nigrostriatal dopamine pathway in rats impairs egocentric learning but not spatial learning or behavioral flexibility.

Authors:  Katharine M Seip-Cammack; James J Young; Megan E Young; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Cognitive deficits in a mouse model of pre-manifest Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Iddo Magen; Sheila M Fleming; Chunni Zhu; Eddie C Garcia; Katherine M Cardiff; Diana Dinh; Krystal De La Rosa; Maria Sanchez; Eileen Ruth Torres; Eliezer Masliah; J David Jentsch; Marie-Françoise Chesselet
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions impair probabilistic reversal learning by reducing sensitivity to positive reward feedback.

Authors:  Anam Syed; Phillip M Baker; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Monoamine levels within the orbitofrontal cortex and putamen interact to predict reversal learning performance.

Authors:  Stephanie M Groman; Alex S James; Emanuele Seu; Maverick A Crawford; Sandra N Harpster; James David Jentsch
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Baseline frontostriatal-limbic connectivity predicts reward-based memory formation.

Authors:  Janne M Hamann; Eran Dayan; Friedhelm C Hummel; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Serotonin modulates sensitivity to reward and negative feedback in a probabilistic reversal learning task in rats.

Authors:  Andrea Bari; David E Theobald; Daniele Caprioli; Adam C Mar; Alex Aidoo-Micah; Jeffrey W Dalley; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.