OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of visual feedback in the reduction of plantar pressures through teaching a "new" gait pattern to diabetic peripheral neuropathy subjects. Immediate, next day, and 1-week retention were studied to determine if motor pattern changes could occur. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: VA Urban Healthcare System. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine community-dwelling older adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy volunteered. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized into feedback and no-feedback groups. All subjects received instruction and 2 days of practice and returned for a 1-week retention test. Instruction to pull the leg forward from the hip to initiate swing rather than push off the ground with the foot while walking was given to all subjects. The feedback group received visual feedback regarding peak plantar pressures after each practice trial. The no-feedback group received no feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak plantar pressures in the forefoot region for immediate retention (retention 1), next day retention (retention 2), and long-term retention (1-week retention). RESULTS:Peak plantar pressures were significantly (P < .01) reduced from baseline to retention 2 testing at the first metatarsal area in the feedback group. The feedback group walked significantly (P < .01) slower at retention 1 and 1-week testing compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS:Individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were unable to use a "new" strategy gait pattern to reduce peak plantar pressures long term (1 week). The use of visual feedback following the trial did not assist in the learning of a new walking pattern.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of visual feedback in the reduction of plantar pressures through teaching a "new" gait pattern to diabetic peripheral neuropathy subjects. Immediate, next day, and 1-week retention were studied to determine if motor pattern changes could occur. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: VA Urban Healthcare System. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine community-dwelling older adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy volunteered. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized into feedback and no-feedback groups. All subjects received instruction and 2 days of practice and returned for a 1-week retention test. Instruction to pull the leg forward from the hip to initiate swing rather than push off the ground with the foot while walking was given to all subjects. The feedback group received visual feedback regarding peak plantar pressures after each practice trial. The no-feedback group received no feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak plantar pressures in the forefoot region for immediate retention (retention 1), next day retention (retention 2), and long-term retention (1-week retention). RESULTS: Peak plantar pressures were significantly (P < .01) reduced from baseline to retention 2 testing at the first metatarsal area in the feedback group. The feedback group walked significantly (P < .01) slower at retention 1 and 1-week testing compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were unable to use a "new" strategy gait pattern to reduce peak plantar pressures long term (1 week). The use of visual feedback following the trial did not assist in the learning of a new walking pattern.
Authors: Michelle R Kaminski; Jonathan Golledge; Joel W J Lasschuit; Karl-Heinz Schott; James Charles; Jane Cheney; Anita Raspovic Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Cristina D Sartor; Renata H Hasue; Lícia P Cacciari; Marco K Butugan; Ricky Watari; Anice C Pássaro; Claudia Giacomozzi; Isabel C N Sacco Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Aline A Gomes; Marko Ackermann; Jean P Ferreira; Maria Isabel V Orselli; Isabel C N Sacco Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Jane S S P Ferreira; Isabel C N Sacco; Alisson A Siqueira; Maria H M Almeida; Cristina D Sartor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E Q Silva; E Y Suda; D P Santos; J L Veríssimo; J S S P Ferreira; R H Cruvinel Júnior; R L Monteiro; C D Sartor; I C N Sacco Journal: Trials Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Érica Q Silva; Danilo P Santos; Raquel I Beteli; Renan L Monteiro; Jane S S P Ferreira; Ronaldo H Cruvinel-Junior; Asha Donini; Jady L Verissímo; Eneida Y Suda; Isabel C N Sacco Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Kevin Deschamps; Giovanni Arnoldo Matricali; Philip Roosen; Kaat Desloovere; Herman Bruyninckx; Pieter Spaepen; Frank Nobels; Jos Tits; Mieke Flour; Filip Staes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katie E Chatwin; Caroline A Abbott; Andrew J M Boulton; Frank L Bowling; Neil D Reeves Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 4.876