Literature DB >> 19627684

Repeatability of physiotherapy chest wall vibrations applied to spontaneously breathing adults.

Harriet Shannon1, Rachael Gregson, Janet Stocks, Tim J Cole, Eleanor Main.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Chest wall vibrations are commonly used techniques that remain largely unquantified. In order to understand their effects, it is essential to measure the forces applied and their repeatability over time. This study investigated the repeatability of vibrations within and between test occasions.
DESIGN: Test-retest repeatability study. PARTICIPANTS: Eight physiotherapists applied vibrations to two healthy female adults. INTERVENTION: Physiotherapists performed seven vibrations on each subject, and measurements were repeated after 24 hours and 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: A force-sensing mat placed over the subject's chest measured the amplitude, duration and force profile of each physiotherapist's vibrations.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in maximum force, duration, frequency of oscillation or amplitude of oscillation within each set of seven chest wall vibrations, confirmed by repeated measures analysis of variance (P=0.42). However, there were wide variations in vibrations between different physiotherapists. Maximum forces ranged from 71 to 258 N, with frequency and amplitude of oscillation ranging from 3 to 11 Hz and 2 to 66 N, respectively. Duration of vibration ranged from 2 to 5 seconds. While there was no systematic bias in forces applied between test occasions, limits of agreement were wide following an interval of 24 hours (-34 to 58 N) and wider still after 6 months (-84 to 76 N).
CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists exhibit fine control of techniques, delivering vibrations uniformly within single test occasions. However, the variation between therapists and test occasions precludes accurate prediction of applied forces when treating stable patients on consecutive occasions. Furthermore, this study raises important questions about factors influencing the pattern and magnitude of forces applied, and the clinical and physiological effects of such variations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19627684     DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2008.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiotherapy        ISSN: 0031-9406            Impact factor:   3.358


  3 in total

1.  Benefit of educational feedback for the use of positive expiratory pressure device.

Authors:  Gregory Reychler; Manon Jacquemart; William Poncin; Anne-Sophie Aubriot; Giuseppe Liistro
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  A systematic review of statistical methods used to test for reliability of medical instruments measuring continuous variables.

Authors:  Rafdzah Zaki; Awang Bulgiba; Noorhaire Nordin; Noor Azina Ismail
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.699

3.  Effects of chest wall compression on expiratory flow rates in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Masafumi Nozoe; Kyoshi Mase; Tomoyuki Ogino; Shigefumi Murakami; Sachie Takashima; Kazuhisa Domen
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.377

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.