BACKGROUND: Previous findings revealed that the acquisition of new semantic concepts' labels was impaired in uncomplicated alcoholic patients. The use of errorless learning may therefore allow them to improve learning performance. However, the flexibility of the new knowledge and the memory processes involved in errorless learning remain unclear. METHOD: New concepts' labels acquisition was examined in 15 alcoholic patients and 15 control participants in an errorless learning condition compared with 19 alcoholic patients and 19 control subjects in a trial-and-error learning condition. The flexibility of the new information was evaluated using different photographs from those used in the learning sessions but representing the same concepts. All of the participants carried out an additional explicit memory task and an implicit memory task was also performed by subjects in the errorless learning condition. RESULTS: The alcoholic group in the errorless condition differed significantly from the alcoholic group in the trial-and-error condition but did not differ from the two control groups. There was no significant difference between results in the learning test and the flexibility task. Finally, in the alcoholic group, the naming score in the learning test was correlated with the explicit memory score but not with the implicit memory score. CONCLUSIONS: Using errorless learning, alcoholics improved their abilities to learn new concepts' labels. Moreover, new knowledge acquired with errorless learning was flexible. The errorless learning advantage may rely on explicit rather than implicit memory processes in these alcohol-dependent patients presenting only mild to moderate deficits of explicit memory capacities.
BACKGROUND: Previous findings revealed that the acquisition of new semantic concepts' labels was impaired in uncomplicated alcoholic patients. The use of errorless learning may therefore allow them to improve learning performance. However, the flexibility of the new knowledge and the memory processes involved in errorless learning remain unclear. METHOD: New concepts' labels acquisition was examined in 15 alcoholic patients and 15 control participants in an errorless learning condition compared with 19 alcoholic patients and 19 control subjects in a trial-and-error learning condition. The flexibility of the new information was evaluated using different photographs from those used in the learning sessions but representing the same concepts. All of the participants carried out an additional explicit memory task and an implicit memory task was also performed by subjects in the errorless learning condition. RESULTS: The alcoholic group in the errorless condition differed significantly from the alcoholic group in the trial-and-error condition but did not differ from the two control groups. There was no significant difference between results in the learning test and the flexibility task. Finally, in the alcoholic group, the naming score in the learning test was correlated with the explicit memory score but not with the implicit memory score. CONCLUSIONS: Using errorless learning, alcoholics improved their abilities to learn new concepts' labels. Moreover, new knowledge acquired with errorless learning was flexible. The errorless learning advantage may rely on explicit rather than implicit memory processes in these alcohol-dependent patients presenting only mild to moderate deficits of explicit memory capacities.
Authors: H J Weingartner; P J Andreason; D W Hommer; K Y Sirocco; D E Rio; U E Ruttimann; R R Rawlings; M J Eckardt Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 1996-07-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: X Noël; M Van der Linden; N Schmidt; R Sferrazza; C Hanak; O Le Bon; J De Mol; C Kornreich; I Pelc; P Verbanck Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2001-12
Authors: Anne Lise Pitel; Hélène Beaunieux; Bérengère Guillery-Girard; Thomas Witkowski; Vincent de la Sayette; Fausto Viader; Béatrice Desgranges; Francis Eustache Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Laura Moreno-López; Emmanuel A Stamatakis; Maria José Fernández-Serrano; Manuel Gómez-Río; Antonio Rodríguez-Fernández; Miguel Pérez-García; Antonio Verdejo-García Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Viola L Nemeth; Eszter Kurgyis; Gabor Csifcsak; Anikó Maraz; Denes A Almasi; Gergely Drotos; Petronella Szikszay; Balint Ando; Zoltán Janka; Anita Must Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2014-12-02