Literature DB >> 19626378

Additional value of FDG-PET/CT in management of "solitary" liver metastases: preliminary results of a prospective multicenter study.

Gaia Grassetto1, Adriano Fornasiero, Giorgio Bonciarelli, Elena Banti, Lucia Rampin, Maria Cristina Marzola, Arianna Massaro, Fabrizio Galeotti, Giuseppe Del Favero, Felice Pasini, Anna Maria Minicozzi, Adil Al-Nahhas, Claudio Cordiano, Domenico Rubello.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The most common malignancy affecting the liver is metastasis from a wide variety of tumors, particularly those of gastrointestinal origin. Successful surgical removal of a solitary liver metastasis may significantly extend survival and optimal preoperative assessment in this regard is a mandatory prerequisite for proper patient selection. The addition of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to other more conventional imaging procedures (e.g., ultrasound (US), CT, and magnetic resonance) has the potential to greatly improve the selection process by the combination of high-resolution anatomy afforded by CT directly combined with the functional scintigraphic map of intra- and extrahepatic lesions depicted by 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-PET. In this study, we assess the additional value of PET/CT in the management strategy of patients with solitary liver metastasis from colorectal and other cancers identified by conventional imaging methods.
METHODS: We evaluated 43 consecutive patients (17 males, 26 females, mean age 53 +/- 6 years) with known solitary liver metastasis. This sample consisted of 18 patients with colorectal cancer, 15 with nonsmall cell lung cancer, six with breast carcinoma, and four ovarian cancers. In addition to contrast-enhanced CT and US, all patients were studied with FDG-PET/CT before surgery. PET/CT was performed within 3 weeks of the initial diagnosis and the scans were read by two experienced radiologists/nuclear medicine specialists blinded to the clinical data. A final diagnosis was obtained at surgery in 31 patients, by fine needle biopsy in five, and long-term clinical, biochemical, and follow-up imaging in seven patients.
RESULTS: In 12 out of 43 patients (28%), PET/CT resulted in restaging disease and a change in therapy. Twenty-two of 31 patients with confirmed solitary liver lesions (71%) were disease-free, eight of 31 (26%) developed a new recurrence, and one of 31 (3%) died from disease progression over a 17 +/- 6-month follow-up interval. Nine of 12 patients (75%) with multiple metastases demonstrated by FDG-PET/CT were alive with disease and three of 12 (25%) deceased due to disease progression (p < 0.01) over a 17 +/- 6-month follow-up interval.
CONCLUSION: The addition of FDG-PET/CT to the routine assessment of patients with liver metastasis has a significant impact on disease staging and selection of suitable candidates for solitary liver metastasis resection and outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19626378     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-009-0249-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  20 in total

1.  Usefulness of intraoperative sonography for revealing hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer in patients selected for surgery after undergoing FDG PET.

Authors:  Bartosz Rydzewski; Farrokh Dehdashti; Brigid A Gordon; Sharlene A Teefey; Steven M Strasberg; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Vascular occlusion in hepatic resections in cirrhotic rat livers: an experimental study in rats.

Authors:  J Figueras; L Farran; C Benasco; Y Ribas; E Ramos; F G Borobia; R Fradera; J Castellví; C Lama; E Jaurrieta
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1997-11

Review 3.  The impact of fluor-18-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in the management of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Bastiaan Wiering; Paul F M Krabbe; Gerrit J Jager; Wim J G Oyen; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The role of FDG-PET in the selection of patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  B Wiering; P F M Krabbe; H M Dekker; W J G Oyen; T J M Ruers
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis--meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shandra Bipat; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Emile F I Comans; Milan E J Pijl; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  FDG-PET improves management of patients with colorectal liver metastases allocated for local treatment: a consecutive prospective study.

Authors:  M Sørensen; F V Mortensen; M Høyer; H Vilstrup; S Keiding
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.360

Review 7.  Positron emission tomography/computer tomography: challenge to conventional imaging modalities in evaluating primary and metastatic liver malignancies.

Authors:  Long Sun; Hua Wu; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Invasive therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver.

Authors:  K W Millikan; E D Staren; A Doolas
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic disease to the liver.

Authors:  Cletus A Arciero; Elin R Sigurdson
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  An update and our experience with metastatic liver disease.

Authors:  Mahim Koshariya; Rajan B Jagad; Jun Kawamoto; P Papastratis; H Kefalourous; T Porfiris; Christina Tzouma; N J Lygidakis
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007-12
View more
  6 in total

1.  The role of 18FDG PET/CT in the management of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Alec H Engledow; James R A Skipworth; Farrokh Pakzad; Charles Imber; Peter J Ell; Ashley M Groves
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  FDG-PET for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer: Advances and current limitations.

Authors:  Koji Murakami
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-10

4.  Nuclear imaging for functional evaluation and theragnosis in liver malignancy and transplantation.

Authors:  Jae Seon Eo; Jin Chul Paeng; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  The diagnostics of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Magdalena Swiderska; Barbara Choromańska; Ewelina Dąbrowska; Emilia Konarzewska-Duchnowska; Katarzyna Choromańska; Grzegorz Szczurko; Piotr Myśliwiec; Jacek Dadan; Jerzy Robert Ladny; Krzysztof Zwierz
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 6.  Accuracy of lung cancer staging in the multidisciplinary team setting.

Authors:  Chong-Kin Liam; Yong-Sheng Liam; Mau-Ern Poh; Chee-Kuan Wong
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.