David C Steffens1. 1. Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. steff001@mc.duke.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Research in geriatric depression has always had a multidisciplinary bent, particularly in methods used to characterize depression. Understanding diagnosis, psychiatric comorbidities, and course continues to be a goal of clinical researchers. Those interested in cognitive neuroscience and basic neuroscience have more recently trained their sights on late-life depression. This review identifies recent progress in the characterization of geriatric depression using a variety of methodologies. RECENT FINDINGS: Depression in the elderly remains underdetected and underdiagnosed, particularly in nonmental health settings. Studies of the impact of psychiatric comorbidities and of the negative outcomes of depression in older adults demonstrate that geriatric depression is a serious medical condition that not only affects mood but can also lead to functional and cognitive decline. Advances in neuroimaging technology have demonstrated structural and functional changes in the brains of older depressed patients. With the advent of brain banks in neuropsychiatry, we are now seeing postmortem neuroanatomical studies that seek to extend findings from clinical practice and from neuroimaging research. SUMMARY: Clinicians should become more aware of advances in detection of depression, the effect of psychiatric comorbidities, the poor mood and cognitive outcomes associated with late-life depression and should keep abreast of recent neuroimaging and neuroanatomical findings.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Research in geriatric depression has always had a multidisciplinary bent, particularly in methods used to characterize depression. Understanding diagnosis, psychiatric comorbidities, and course continues to be a goal of clinical researchers. Those interested in cognitive neuroscience and basic neuroscience have more recently trained their sights on late-life depression. This review identifies recent progress in the characterization of geriatric depression using a variety of methodologies. RECENT FINDINGS:Depression in the elderly remains underdetected and underdiagnosed, particularly in nonmental health settings. Studies of the impact of psychiatric comorbidities and of the negative outcomes of depression in older adults demonstrate that geriatric depression is a serious medical condition that not only affects mood but can also lead to functional and cognitive decline. Advances in neuroimaging technology have demonstrated structural and functional changes in the brains of older depressedpatients. With the advent of brain banks in neuropsychiatry, we are now seeing postmortem neuroanatomical studies that seek to extend findings from clinical practice and from neuroimaging research. SUMMARY: Clinicians should become more aware of advances in detection of depression, the effect of psychiatric comorbidities, the poor mood and cognitive outcomes associated with late-life depression and should keep abreast of recent neuroimaging and neuroanatomical findings.
Authors: Gwenn S Smith; Faith M Gunning-Dixon; Francis E Lotrich; Warren D Taylor; Jovier D Evans Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: David C Steffens; Emeline Otey; George S Alexopoulos; Meryl A Butters; Bruce Cuthbert; Mary Ganguli; Yonas E Geda; Hugh C Hendrie; Ranga R Krishnan; Anand Kumar; Oscar L Lopez; Constantine G Lyketsos; Benjamin T Mast; John C Morris; Maria C Norton; Guerry M Peavy; Ronald C Petersen; Charles F Reynolds; Stephen Salloway; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Jerome Yesavage Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-02
Authors: Faith M Gunning-Dixon; Matthew J Hoptman; Kelvin O Lim; Christopher F Murphy; Sibel Klimstra; Vassilios Latoussakis; Magdalena Majcher-Tascio; Jan Hrabe; Babak A Ardekani; George S Alexopoulos Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: John Cairney; Laurie M Corna; Scott Veldhuizen; Nathan Herrmann; David L Streiner Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Jolanda C M van Haastregt; G A Rixt Zijlstra; Erik van Rossum; Jacques Th M van Eijk; Gertrudis I J M Kempen Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Warren D Taylor; Stephan Züchner; Douglas R McQuoid; Martha E Payne; James R MacFall; David C Steffens; Marcy C Speer; K Ranga R Krishnan Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Zheen Zhao; Warren D Taylor; Martin Styner; David C Steffens; K Ranga R Krishnan; James R MacFall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-03-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E Mamplekou; V Bountziouka; T Psaltopoulou; A Zeimbekis; N Tsakoundakis; N Papaerakleous; E Gotsis; G Metallinos; G Pounis; E Polychronopoulos; C Lionis; D Panagiotakos Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Lihong Wang; Guy G Potter; R K Ranga Krishnan; Florin Dolcos; Gwenn S Smith; David C Steffens Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Hannie C Comijs; Harm W van Marwijk; Roos C van der Mast; Paul Naarding; Richard C Oude Voshaar; Aartjan Tf Beekman; Marjolein Boshuisen; Janny Dekker; Rob Kok; Margot Wm de Waal; Brenda Wjh Penninx; Max L Stek; Johannes H Smit Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2011-12-05
Authors: Hannie C Comijs; Jasper Nieuwesteeg; Rob Kok; Harm W van Marwijk; Roos C van der Mast; Paul Naarding; Richard C Oude Voshaar; Peter Verhaak; Margot Wm de Waal; Max L Stek Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.630