Literature DB >> 19625904

Vertebral compression fractures in patients presenting with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

Kaisorn L Chaichana1, Courtney Pendleton, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Ziya L Gokaslan, Daniel M Sciubba.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is a relatively common and debilitating complication of metastatic disease that often results in neurological deficits. Pathological fractures of the vertebral body in patients with MESCC are not uncommon. The goals of this study were to evaluate the effects of compression fractures on long-term neurological function, as well as understand the factors that predict the development of pathological fractures for patients with MESCC.
METHODS: One hundred sixty-two patients undergoing decompressive surgery for MESCC at an academic tertiary care institution from 1995 to 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the effects of pathological vertebral body fractures on ambulatory outcome, whereas multivariate logistical regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with preoperative compression fractures.
RESULTS: Sixty and 102 patients presented with and without pathological vertebral body fractures, respectively, and MESCC. Patients were followed for a mean of 9.7 +/- 2.6 months. The presence of preoperative compression fractures was independently associated with decreased postoperative ambulatory status (odds ratio, 2.106; 95% confidence interval, 1.123-4.355; P = 0.03). This was independent of age, preoperative ambulatory status, preoperative motor deficit, duration of preoperative symptoms, immediate postoperative motor deficit, and lytic tumor appearance. The factors strongly associated with preoperative compression fractures in this study include lack of sensory deficits (P = 0.01), primary breast cancer (P = 0.008), anterior spine metastases (P = 0.005), thoracic spine involvement (P = 0.01), preoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.03), and, possibly, preoperative radiation therapy (P = 0.16).
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study may provide insight into risk stratifying as well as guiding surgical management for patients with MESCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625904     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000349919.31636.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  8 in total

1.  Prolonged survival following aggressive treatment for metastatic breast cancer in the spine.

Authors:  Patricia L Zadnik; Lee Hwang; Derek G Ju; Mari L Groves; Jackson Sui; Alp Yurter; Timothy F Witham; Ali Bydon; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Metastatic human breast cancer to the spine produces mechanical hyperalgesia and gait deficits in rodents.

Authors:  Rachel Sarabia-Estrada; Alejandro Ruiz-Valls; Hugo Guerrero-Cazares; Ana M Ampuero; Ismael Jimenez-Estrada; Samantha De Silva; Lydia J Bernhardt; Courtney Rory Goodwin; Ali Karim Ahmed; Yuxin Li; Neil A Phillips; Ziya L Gokaslan; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Patients with cervical metastasis and neoplastic pachymeningitis are less likely to improve neurologically after surgery.

Authors:  Vincenzo Denaro; Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Luca Denaro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Predicting Neurologic Recovery after Surgery in Patients with Deficits Secondary to MESCC: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ilya Laufer; Scott L Zuckerman; Justin E Bird; Mark H Bilsky; Áron Lazáry; Nasir A Quraishi; Michael G Fehlings; Daniel M Sciubba; John H Shin; Addisu Mesfin; Arjun Sahgal; Charles G Fisher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Malignant cord compression: A critical appraisal of prognostic factors predicting functional outcome after surgical treatment.

Authors:  Cornelia Putz; Joost J van Middendorp; Martin H Pouw; Babak Moradi; Rüdiger Rupp; Norbert Weidner; Carl Hans Fürstenberg
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2010-07

Review 6.  Evaluating ambulatory function as an outcome following treatment for spinal metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lananh Nguyen; Nicole Agaronnik; Marco L Ferrone; Jeffrey N Katz; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Prognostic parameters and spinal metastases: a research study.

Authors:  Jefferson W Daniel; José C E Veiga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Palliative Surgery in Treating Painful Metastases of the Upper Cervical Spine: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Xinghuo Wu; Zhewei Ye; Feifei Pu; Songfeng Chen; Baichuan Wang; Zhicai Zhang; Cao Yang; Shuhua Yang; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.