Literature DB >> 19625831

Managing to improve quality: the relationship between accreditation standards, safety practices, and patient outcomes.

Deirdre K Thornlow1, Elizabeth Merwin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the trend toward eliminating reimbursement for "never events," hospital administrators are challenged to implement practices designed to prevent their occurrence. Little evidence exists, however, that patient safety practices, as evaluated using accreditation criteria, are related to the achievement of patient safety outcomes.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between patient safety practices, as measured by accreditation standards, and patient safety outcomes as measured by hospital rates of infections, decubitus ulcers, postoperative respiratory failure, and failure to rescue.
METHODOLOGY: Secondary data were used to examine relationships between patient-safety-related accreditation standards and patient outcomes in U.S. acute care hospitals. Accreditation performance areas were reduced into subscores to represent patient safety practices. Outcome rates were calculated using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator software. Multivariate regression was performed to determine the significance of the relationships.
FINDINGS: Three of four multivariate models significantly explained variance in hospital patient safety indicator rates. Accreditation standards reflecting patient safety practices were related to some outcomes but not others. Rates of infections and decubitus ulcers occurred more frequently in hospitals with poorer performance in utilizing patient safety practices, but no differences were noted in rates of postoperative respiratory failure or failure to rescue. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Certain adverse events, such as infections and decubiti, may be reduced by preventive protocols that are reflected in accreditation standards, whereas other events, such as failure to rescue and postoperative respiratory failure, may require multifaceted strategies that are less easily translated into protocols. Our approach may have influenced the observed associations yet represents progress toward assessing whether safety practices, as measured by accreditation standards, are related to patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625831     DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181a16bce

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev        ISSN: 0361-6274


  4 in total

Review 1.  The standard of healthcare accreditation standards: a review of empirical research underpinning their development and impact.

Authors:  David Greenfield; Marjorie Pawsey; Reece Hinchcliff; Max Moldovan; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  An Analysis of Hospital Accreditation Policy in Iran.

Authors:  Taraneh Yousefinezhadi; Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad; Mohammad Arab; Mozhdeh Ramezani; Ali Akbari Sari
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.429

3.  Accrediting private providers with National Health Insurance to better serve low-income populations in Kenya and Ghana: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lauren Suchman
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-12-05

4.  Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review.

Authors:  Lisanne Hut-Mossel; Kees Ahaus; Gera Welker; Rijk Gans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.