Literature DB >> 19625777

Low-dose DNA damage and replication stress responses quantified by optimized automated single-cell image analysis.

Martin Mistrik1, Lenka Oplustilova, Jiri Lukas, Jiri Bartek.   

Abstract

Maintenance of genome integrity is essential for homeostasis and survival as impaired DNA damage response (DDR) may predispose to grave pathologies such as neurodegenerative and immunodeficiency syndromes, cancer and premature aging. Therefore, accurate assessment of DNA damage caused by environmental or metabolic genotoxic insults is critical for contemporary biomedicine. The available physical, flow cytometry and sophisticated scanning approaches to DNA damage estimation each have some drawbacks such as insufficient sensitivity, limitation to analysis of cells in suspension, or high costs and demand for trained personnel. Here we present an option how to transform a regular fluorescence microscope and personal computer with common software into a functional alternative to high-throughput screening devices. In two detailed protocols we introduce a new semi-automatic procedure allowing for very sensitive, quantitative, rapid and simple fluorescence image analysis in thousands of adherent cells per day. Sensitive DNA breakage estimation through analysis of phosphorylated histone H2AX (gamma-H2AX), and homologous recombination (HR) assessed by a new RPA/Rad51 dual-marker approach illustrate the advantages and applicability of this technique. Our present data on assessment of low radiation doses, repair kinetics, spontaneous DNA damage in cancer cells, as well as constitutive and replication stress-induced HR events and their dependence on upstream factors within the DDR machinery document the versatility of the method. We believe this affordable approach may facilitate mechanistic insights into the role of low-dose DNA damage in human diseases, and generally promote both basic and translational research in many areas of biomedicine where suitable fluorescence markers are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625777     DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.16.9331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  8 in total

1.  DNA damage-induced dynamic changes in abundance and cytosol-nuclear translocation of proteins involved in translational processes, metabolism, and autophagy.

Authors:  Martin V Bennetzen; Martin Kosar; Jakob Bunkenborg; Mark Ronald Payne; Jirina Bartkova; Mikael S Lindström; Jiri Lukas; Jens S Andersen; Jiri Bartek; Dorthe Helena Larsen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Multiplexed-Based Assessment of DNA Damage Response to Chemotherapies Using Cell Imaging Cytometry.

Authors:  Nadia Vezzio-Vié; Marie-Alice Kong-Hap; Eve Combès; Augusto Faria Andrade; Maguy Del Rio; Philippe Pasero; Charles Theillet; Céline Gongora; Philippe Pourquier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Multispectral imaging flow cytometry reveals distinct frequencies of γ-H2AX foci induction in DNA double strand break repair defective human cell lines.

Authors:  Emma C Bourton; Piers N Plowman; Sheba Adam Zahir; Gonul Ulus Senguloglu; Hiba Serrai; Graham Bottley; Christopher N Parris
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Enhanced γ-H2AX DNA damage foci detection using multimagnification and extended depth of field in imaging flow cytometry.

Authors:  Christopher N Parris; Sheba Adam Zahir; Hussein Al-Ali; Emma C Bourton; Christina Plowman; Piers N Plowman
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  Myc and Ras oncogenes engage different energy metabolism programs and evoke distinct patterns of oxidative and DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Jitka Ostrakova; Martin Kosar; Arnaldur Hall; Pavlina Duskova; Martin Mistrik; Joanna Maria Merchut-Maya; Zdenek Hodny; Jirina Bartkova; Claus Christensen; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 6.  Common Chemical Inductors of Replication Stress:  Focus on Cell-Based Studies.

Authors:  Eva Vesela; Katarina Chroma; Zsofia Turi; Martin Mistrik
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2017-02-21

7.  Human Fbh1 helicase contributes to genome maintenance via pro- and anti-recombinase activities.

Authors:  Kasper Fugger; Martin Mistrik; Jannie Rendtlew Danielsen; Christoffel Dinant; Jacob Falck; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas; Niels Mailand
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  The efficiency of homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining systems in repairing double-strand breaks during cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Leonardo Bee; Sonia Fabris; Roberto Cherubini; Maddalena Mognato; Lucia Celotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.