Literature DB >> 19625626

Scaling properties of European research units.

Bjørn Jamtveit1, Espen Jettestuen, Joachim Mathiesen.   

Abstract

A quantitative characterization of the scale-dependent features of research units may provide important insight into how such units are organized and how they grow. The relative importance of top-down versus bottom-up controls on their growth may be revealed by their scaling properties. Here we show that the number of support staff in Scandinavian research units, ranging in size from 20 to 7,800 staff members, is related to the number of academic staff by a power law. The scaling exponent of approximately 1.30 is broadly consistent with a simple hierarchical model of the university organization. Similar scaling behavior between small and large research units with a wide range of ambitions and strategies argues against top-down control of the growth. Top-down effects, and externally imposed effects from changing political environments, can be observed as fluctuations around the main trend. The observed scaling law implies that cost-benefit arguments for merging research institutions into larger and larger units may have limited validity unless the productivity per academic staff and/or the quality of the products are considerably higher in larger institutions. Despite the hierarchical structure of most large-scale research units in Europe, the network structures represented by the academic component of such units are strongly antihierarchical and suboptimal for efficient communication within individual units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625626      PMCID: PMC2714277          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903190106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks.

Authors:  Sergei Maslov; Kim Sneppen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Size and form in efficient transportation networks.

Authors:  J R Banavar; A Maritan; A Rinaldo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Self-similar community structure in a network of human interactions.

Authors:  R Guimerà; L Danon; A Díaz-Guilera; F Giralt; A Arenas
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2003-12-17

4.  Scaling laws in the functional content of genomes.

Authors:  Erik van Nimwegen
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Hierarchy measures in complex networks.

Authors:  Ala Trusina; Sergei Maslov; Petter Minnhagen; Kim Sneppen
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 6.  The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization.

Authors:  Geoffrey B West; James H Brown
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology.

Authors:  G B West; J H Brown; B J Enquist
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Universities scale like cities.

Authors:  Anthony F J van Raan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The dynamics of mergers and acquisitions: ancestry as the seminal determinant.

Authors:  Eduardo Viegas; Stuart P Cockburn; Henrik J Jensen; Geoffrey B West
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Size, Accumulation and Performance for Research Grants: Examining the Role of Size for Centres of Excellence.

Authors:  Carter Bloch; Jesper W Schneider; Thomas Sinkjær
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Urban Scaling of Cities in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anthony F J van Raan; Gerwin van der Meulen; Willem Goedhart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.