UNLABELLED: Few studies have examined the relationship between degree of lesion in various locations and improvement during treatment in stroke patients with chronic aphasia. The main purpose of this study was to determine whether the degree of lesion in specific brain regions was related to magnitude of improvement over the course of object and action naming treatments. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Fifteen left hemisphere stroke patients with aphasia participated in treatments for object and/or action naming. Two raters assessed extent of lesion in 18 left hemisphere cortical and subcortical regions of interest (ROIs) on CT or MRI scans. Correlations were calculated between composite basal ganglia, anterior cortical, and posterior cortical lesion ratings, on the one hand, and both pretreatment scores and treatment change for both object and action naming, on the other hand. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, greater anterior cortical lesion extent was highly correlated with better object and action naming scores prior to treatment and with greater improvement during treatment when partial correlations controlled for total basal ganglia lesion extent (r ranging from .730 to .858). Greater total basal ganglia lesion extent was highly correlated with worse object and action naming scores prior to treatment and with less improvement during treatment when partial correlations controlled for total anterior lesion extent (r ranging from -.623 to -.785). Correlations between degree of posterior cortical lesion and naming indices generally were not significant. No consistent differences were found between the correlations of ROI lesion ratings with object naming versus action naming scores. CONCLUSION: Large anterior cortical lesions and intactness of the basal ganglia may both contribute to more efficient reorganization of language functions.
UNLABELLED: Few studies have examined the relationship between degree of lesion in various locations and improvement during treatment in strokepatients with chronic aphasia. The main purpose of this study was to determine whether the degree of lesion in specific brain regions was related to magnitude of improvement over the course of object and action naming treatments. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Fifteen left hemisphere strokepatients with aphasia participated in treatments for object and/or action naming. Two raters assessed extent of lesion in 18 left hemisphere cortical and subcortical regions of interest (ROIs) on CT or MRI scans. Correlations were calculated between composite basal ganglia, anterior cortical, and posterior cortical lesion ratings, on the one hand, and both pretreatment scores and treatment change for both object and action naming, on the other hand. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, greater anterior cortical lesion extent was highly correlated with better object and action naming scores prior to treatment and with greater improvement during treatment when partial correlations controlled for total basal ganglia lesion extent (r ranging from .730 to .858). Greater total basal ganglia lesion extent was highly correlated with worse object and action naming scores prior to treatment and with less improvement during treatment when partial correlations controlled for total anterior lesion extent (r ranging from -.623 to -.785). Correlations between degree of posterior cortical lesion and naming indices generally were not significant. No consistent differences were found between the correlations of ROI lesion ratings with object naming versus action naming scores. CONCLUSION: Large anterior cortical lesions and intactness of the basal ganglia may both contribute to more efficient reorganization of language functions.
Authors: Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Marjorie Nicholas; Errol H Baker; Heidi Seekins; Masahito Kobayashi; Hugo Theoret; Felipe Fregni; Jose Maria-Tormos; Jacquie Kurland; Karl W Doron; Alvaro Pascual-Leone Journal: Brain Lang Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Bruce Crosson; Anna Bacon Moore; Kaundinya Gopinath; Keith D White; Christina E Wierenga; Megan E Gaiefsky; Katherine S Fabrizio; Kyung K Peck; David Soltysik; Christina Milsted; Richard W Briggs; Tim W Conway; Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Lisa H Lu; Bruce Crosson; Stephen E Nadeau; Kenneth M Heilman; Leslie J Gonzalez-Rothi; Anastasia Raymer; Robin L Gilmore; Russell M Bauer; Steven N Roper Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2002 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: M A Naeser; E H Baker; C L Palumbo; M Nicholas; M P Alexander; R Samaraweera; M N Prete; S M Hodge; T Weissman Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1998-11
Authors: Sophia van Hees; Katie McMahon; Anthony Angwin; Greig de Zubicaray; Stephen Read; David A Copland Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Sarah Marchina; Lin L Zhu; Andrea Norton; Lauryn Zipse; Catherine Y Wan; Gottfried Schlaug Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Bonnie L Breining; Andreia V Faria; Brian Caffo; Erin L Meier; Shannon M Sheppard; Rajani Sebastian; Donna C Tippett; Argye E Hillis Journal: Aphasiology Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Sigfus Kristinsson; Dirk B den Ouden; Chris Rorden; Roger Newman-Norlund; Jean Neils-Strunjas; Julius Fridriksson Journal: J Stroke Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 8.632
Authors: Sigfus Kristinsson; Alexandra Basilakos; Jordan Elm; Leigh Ann Spell; Leonardo Bonilha; Chris Rorden; Dirk B den Ouden; Christy Cassarly; Souvik Sen; Argye Hillis; Gregory Hickok; Julius Fridriksson Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2021-08-05
Authors: Denise Ren da Fontoura; Jaqueline de Carvalho Rodrigues; Luciana Behs de Sá Carneiro; Ana Maria Monção; Jerusa Fumagalli de Salles Journal: Dement Neuropsychol Date: 2012 Oct-Dec