Literature DB >> 19625069

Delayed degradation in soil of foliar herbicides glyphosate and sulcotrione previously absorbed by plants: consequences on herbicide fate and risk assessment.

Jérémy Doublet1, Laure Mamy, Enrique Barriuso.   

Abstract

Following application, pesticides can be intercepted and absorbed by weeds and/or crops. Plants containing pesticides residues may then reach the soil during the crop cycle or after harvest. However, the fate in soil of pesticides residues in plants is unknown. Two commonly used foliar herbicides, glyphosate and sulcotrione, (14)C-labeled, were applied on leaves of oilseed rape and/or maize, translocation was studied, and then soil incubations of aerial parts of plants containing herbicides residues were performed. Soil treated directly with herbicides was used as control. The effects of adjuvants on herbicide plant-absorption and subsequent soil-degradation were also investigated comparing herbicides application as active ingredients and as commercial formulations. The fate in soil of herbicides residues in plants was different from that of control, and different for glyphosate and sulcotrione. Mineralization in soil of glyphosate in crops decreased compared to control, and amounts of (14)C-extractable residues, mainly composed by the metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), and non-extractable residues (NER) increased. In contrast, mineralization in soil of sulcotrione in maize increased compared to control, with a decrease in the (14)C-extractable residues and an increase in NER. The fate of both herbicides was influenced by the type of plant organ in which herbicide was incorporated, because of differences in herbicides bioavailability and organs biodegradability, but not by adjuvants. Absorption of both herbicides in plant delays their subsequent soil-degradation, and particularly, glyphosate persistence in soil could increase from two to six times. The modifications of herbicide degradation in soil due to interception by plants should be considered for environmental risks assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625069     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  3 in total

Review 1.  Microbiomes and glyphosate biodegradation in edaphic and aquatic environments: recent issues and trends.

Authors:  María Celina Zabaloy; Marco Allegrini; Keren Hernandez Guijarro; Filipe Behrends Kraemer; Héctor Morrás; Leonardo Erijman
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Glyphosate effects on plant mineral nutrition, crop rhizosphere microbiota, and plant disease in glyphosate-resistant crops.

Authors:  Stephen O Duke; John Lydon; William C Koskinen; Thomas B Moorman; Rufus L Chaney; Raymond Hammerschmidt
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 3.  Glyphosate, a chelating agent-relevant for ecological risk assessment?

Authors:  Martha Mertens; Sebastian Höss; Günter Neumann; Joshua Afzal; Wolfram Reichenbecher
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.