BACKGROUND: Skin aging is accelerated by extrinsic factors, particularly actinic damage. Over the last decades, both clinical and pathological differences between intrinsic and actinic aging have been characterized. In this work, we aimed at quantifying skin aging by non-invasive in vivo methods. METHODS: Young healthy volunteers using indoor tanning facilities and aged people were compared with appropriate controls by measurements of skin elasticity with the Cutometer and the Reviscometer and by semi-quantitative evaluation of the dermal matrix composition by the multiphoton laser tomograph DermaInspect. RESULTS: We found differences between the sun-protected volar forearm and the dorsal side as well as between young and old test persons with all three methods. No significant differences were found between the skin of indoor-tanned test persons and control. Also, gender had no influence on the severity of skin aging. CONCLUSION: The most consistent results were obtained with the DermaInspect. The considerable inter-individual variation due to the cross-sectional design of the study may have disguised the factual skin damage caused by tanning beds.
BACKGROUND: Skin aging is accelerated by extrinsic factors, particularly actinic damage. Over the last decades, both clinical and pathological differences between intrinsic and actinic aging have been characterized. In this work, we aimed at quantifying skin aging by non-invasive in vivo methods. METHODS: Young healthy volunteers using indoor tanning facilities and aged people were compared with appropriate controls by measurements of skin elasticity with the Cutometer and the Reviscometer and by semi-quantitative evaluation of the dermal matrix composition by the multiphoton laser tomograph DermaInspect. RESULTS: We found differences between the sun-protected volar forearm and the dorsal side as well as between young and old test persons with all three methods. No significant differences were found between the skin of indoor-tanned test persons and control. Also, gender had no influence on the severity of skin aging. CONCLUSION: The most consistent results were obtained with the DermaInspect. The considerable inter-individual variation due to the cross-sectional design of the study may have disguised the factual skin damage caused by tanning beds.
Authors: Ana-Maria Pena; Xueqin Chen; Isaac J Pence; Thomas Bornschlögl; Sinyoung Jeong; Sébastien Grégoire; Gustavo S Luengo; Philippe Hallegot; Peyman Obeidy; Amin Feizpour; Kin F Chan; Conor L Evans Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Stefania Seidenari; Federica Arginelli; Sara Bassoli; Jennifer Cautela; Paul M W French; Mario Guanti; Davide Guardoli; Karsten König; Clifford Talbot; Chris Dunsby Journal: Dermatol Res Pract Date: 2011-11-28
Authors: Pascale Quatresooz; Claudine Piérard-Franchimont; Gérald E Piérard Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 3.390