Literature DB >> 19624034

Mixed signals: combining linguistic and affective functions of eyebrows in questions in sign language of the Netherlands.

Connie de Vos1, Els van der Kooij, Onno Crasborn.   

Abstract

The eyebrows are used as conversational signals in face-to-face spoken interaction (Ekman, 1979). In Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT), the eyebrows are typically furrowed in content questions, and raised in polar questions (Coerts, 1992). On the other hand, these eyebrow positions are also associated with anger and surprise, respectively, in general human communication (Ekman, 1993). This overlap in the functional load of the eyebrow positions results in a potential conflict for NGT signers when combining these functions simultaneously. In order to investigate the effect of the simultaneous realization of both functions on the eyebrow position we elicited instances of both question types with neutral affect and with various affective states. The data were coded using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS: Ekman, Friesen, & Hager, 2002) for type of brow movement as well as for intensity. FACS allows for the coding of muscle groups, which are termed Action Units (AUs) and which produce facial appearance changes. The results show that linguistic and affective functions of eyebrows may influence each other in NGT. That is, in surprised polar questions and angry content question a phonetic enhancement takes place of raising and furrowing, respectively. In the items with contrasting eyebrow movements, the grammatical and affective AUs are either blended (occur simultaneously) or they are realized sequentially. Interestingly, the absence of eyebrow raising (marked by AU 1+2) in angry polar questions, and the presence of eyebrow furrowing (realized by AU 4) in surprised content questions suggests that in general AU 4 may be phonetically stronger than AU 1 and AU 2, independent of its linguistic or affective function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19624034     DOI: 10.1177/0023830909103177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  8 in total

1.  Prosody and Syntax in Sign Languages.

Authors:  Wendy Sandler
Journal:  Trans Philol Soc       Date:  2010-11

2.  How sign language expertise can influence the effects of face masks on non-linguistic characteristics.

Authors:  Wee Kiat Lau; Jana Chalupny; Klaudia Grote; Anke Huckauf
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  THE PHONOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION OF SIGN LANGUAGES.

Authors:  Wendy Sandler
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2012-03-02

4.  Turn-timing in signed conversations: coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries.

Authors:  Connie de Vos; Francisco Torreira; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-24

Review 5.  Visual bodily signals as core devices for coordinating minds in interaction.

Authors:  Judith Holler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.671

6.  Discriminant features and temporal structure of nonmanuals in American Sign Language.

Authors:  C Fabian Benitez-Quiroz; Kadir Gökgöz; Ronnie B Wilbur; Aleix M Martinez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How do typically developing deaf children and deaf children with autism spectrum disorder use the face when comprehending emotional facial expressions in British sign language?

Authors:  Tanya Denmark; Joanna Atkinson; Ruth Campbell; John Swettenham
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-10

8.  Production and Comprehension of Prosodic Markers in Sign Language Imperatives.

Authors:  Diane Brentari; Joshua Falk; Anastasia Giannakidou; Annika Herrmann; Elisabeth Volk; Markus Steinbach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.