Literature DB >> 19623051

Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: False-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle.

Yazine Mahjoub1, Cyrille Pila, Arnaud Friggeri, Elie Zogheib, Eric Lobjoie, Francois Tinturier, Claude Galy, Michel Slama, Herve Dupont.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether peak systolic velocity of tricuspid annular motion assessed by tissue Doppler echocardiography (Sta), a right ventricular function parameter, can discriminate patients with true- and false-positive pulse pressure variation. Pulse pressure variation is used to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. However, this parameter has been reported to be falsely positive, especially in patients with right ventricular dysfunction.
DESIGN: A prospective study.
SETTING: Medical and surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty- five mechanically ventilated patients hospitalized for >24 hrs with a pulse pressure variation of >12%.
INTERVENTIONS: Doppler echocardiography (including measurement of Sta and stroke volume) was performed before and after infusion of 500 mL of colloid solution. Patients were classified into two groups according to their response to fluid infusion: responders (at least 15% increase in stroke volume) and nonresponders.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (66%) were responders (true-positive group) and 12 (34%) were nonresponders (false-positive group). Before volume expansion, Sta was statistically lower in the nonresponder group (0.13 [0.04] vs. 0.20 [0.05], p = .0004). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-1). In patients with pulse pressure variation of >12%, a Sta cutoff value of 0.15 m/s discriminated between responders and nonresponders with a sensitivity of 91% (80-100) and a specificity of 83% (62-100).
CONCLUSIONS: A Sta value of <0.15 m/s seems to be an accurate parameter to detect false-positive pulse pressure variation. Echocardiography should therefore be performed before fluid infusion in patients with pulse pressure variation of >12%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19623051     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a380a3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  52 in total

Review 1.  Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Paul Marik; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Is there a role for invasive hemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure management?

Authors:  Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-06

3.  Prediction of volume responsiveness using pleth variability index in patients undergoing cardiac surgery after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Sebastian Haas; Constantin Trepte; Martin Hinteregger; Rebecca Fahje; Bjoern Sill; Lena Herich; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles and practice in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Echocardiography in the intensive care unit: beyond "eyeballing". A plea for the broader use of the aortic velocity-time integral measurement.

Authors:  Bernard Cholley
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Cardiovascular clusters in septic shock combining clinical and echocardiographic parameters: a post hoc analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Geri; Philippe Vignon; Alix Aubry; Anne-Laure Fedou; Cyril Charron; Stein Silva; Xavier Repessé; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  The use of echocardiographic indices in defining and assessing right ventricular systolic function in critical care research.

Authors:  Stephen J Huang; Marek Nalos; Louise Smith; Arvind Rajamani; Anthony S McLean
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Right ventricular dysfunction during acute respiratory distress syndrome and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Jeroen J H Bunge; Kadir Caliskan; Diederik Gommers; Dinis Reis Miranda
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Alternatives to the Swan-Ganz catheter.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Jan Bakker; Maurizio Cecconi; Ludhmila Hajjar; Da Wei Liu; Suzanna Lobo; Xavier Monnet; Andrea Morelli; Sheila Neinan Myatra; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Teboul; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Pulse pressure variation and volume responsiveness during acutely increased pulmonary artery pressure: an experimental study.

Authors:  Fritz Daudel; David Tüller; Stefanie Krähenbühl; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.