Carol A Brownson1, Thomas J Hoerger2, Edwin B Fisher3, Kerry E Kilpatrick4. 1. The National Program Office of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Diabetes Initiative, Division of Health Behavior Research, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri (Ms Brownson) 2. Research Triangle Institute International (RTI), RTI–University of North Carolina Center of Excellence in Health Promotion Economics, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (Dr Hoerger) 3. National Program Office of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Diabetes Initiative and Peers for Progress, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Fisher) 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Kilpatrick)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of diabetes self-management programs in real-world community primary care settings. Estimates incorporated lifetime reductions in disease progression, costs of adverse events, and increases in quality of life. METHODS: Clinical results and costs were based on programs of the Diabetes Initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, implemented in primary care and community settings in disadvantaged areas with notable health disparities. Program results were used as inputs to a Markov simulation model to estimate the long-term effects of self-management interventions. A health systems perspective was adopted. RESULTS: The simulation model estimates that the intervention does reduce discounted lifetime treatment and complication costs by $3385, but this is more than offset by the $15,031 cost of implementing the intervention and maintaining its effects in subsequent years. The intervention is estimated to reduce long-term complications, leading to an increase in remaining life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $39,563/QALY, well below a common benchmark of $50,000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the model's estimates under various alternative assumptions. The model generally predicts acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management programs for type 2 diabetes are cost-effective from a health systems perspective when the cost savings due to reductions in long-term complications are recognized. These findings may justify increased reimbursement for effective self-management programs in diverse settings.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of diabetes self-management programs in real-world community primary care settings. Estimates incorporated lifetime reductions in disease progression, costs of adverse events, and increases in quality of life. METHODS: Clinical results and costs were based on programs of the Diabetes Initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, implemented in primary care and community settings in disadvantaged areas with notable health disparities. Program results were used as inputs to a Markov simulation model to estimate the long-term effects of self-management interventions. A health systems perspective was adopted. RESULTS: The simulation model estimates that the intervention does reduce discounted lifetime treatment and complication costs by $3385, but this is more than offset by the $15,031 cost of implementing the intervention and maintaining its effects in subsequent years. The intervention is estimated to reduce long-term complications, leading to an increase in remaining life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $39,563/QALY, well below a common benchmark of $50,000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the model's estimates under various alternative assumptions. The model generally predicts acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management programs for type 2 diabetes are cost-effective from a health systems perspective when the cost savings due to reductions in long-term complications are recognized. These findings may justify increased reimbursement for effective self-management programs in diverse settings.
Authors: Juan J Cabré; Marta Ripoll; Josep M Hernández; Josep Basora; Ferran Bejarano; Victoria Arija Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Edwin B Fisher; Guadalupe X Ayala; Leticia Ibarra; Andrea L Cherrington; John P Elder; Tricia S Tang; Michele Heisler; Monika M Safford; David Simmons Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Edwin B Fisher; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Russell E Glasgow; Debra Haire-Joshu; Laura L Hayman; Robert M Kaplan; Marilyn S Nanney; Judith K Ockene Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Susan L Mills; Teresa J Brady; Janaki Jayanthan; Shabnam Ziabakhsh; Peter M Sargious Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Judith D DePue; Rochelle K Rosen; Andrew Seiden; Nicole Bereolos; Marian L Chima; Michael G Goldstein; Ofeira Nu'usolia; John Tuitele; Stephen T McGarvey Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Megan A Lewis; Carla M Bann; Shawn A Karns; Connie L Hobbs; Sidney Holt; Jeff Brenner; Neil Fleming; Patria Johnson; Kathryn Langwell; Monica E Peek; Joseph A Burton; Thomas J Hoerger; Noreen M Clark; Douglas B Kamerow Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2014-11
Authors: A Thomas McLellan; Joanna L Starrels; Betty Tai; Adam J Gordon; Richard Brown; Udi Ghitza; Marc Gourevitch; Jack Stein; Marla Oros; Terry Horton; Robert Lindblad; Jennifer McNeely Journal: Public Health Rev Date: 2014-01