Literature DB >> 19621695

A prospective randomized comparison of continuous hemihepatic with intermittent total hepatic inflow occlusion in hepatectomy for liver tumors.

Guanlin Liang1, Tianfu Wen, Lunan Yan, B O Li, Guochang Wu, Jian Yang, Bo Lu, Zheyu Chen, Zhixue Liao, Shun Ran, Zhang Yu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate whether continuous hemihepatic inflow occlusion (HHO) during hepatectomy can be safer than and be as effective as intermittent total hepatic inflow occlusion (THO) in reducing blood loss.
METHODOLOGY: Eighty patients undergoing liver resections were included in a prospective randomized study comparing the intra- and postoperative course under THO (n=40) or HHO (n=40). THO was performed with periods of 20 minutes of occlusion and 5 minutes of releasing, while HHO was performed with continuous occlusion. The surface area of liver transection, amount of blood loss, measurements of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and postoperative evolution were recorded.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar at entry in terms of preoperative liver function and in the proportion of patients experiencing major hepatectomy. The total ischemic time of the two groups was similar (p=0.37), but the operative time in the THO group was longer than in the HHO group (p=0.02). No significant difference was found between the HHO and THO group in blood loss during liver parenchyma transection (p=0.14), the elevations of ALT and AST on the first postoperative day (ALT: p=0.12; AST: p=0.66) and postoperative morbidity (p=0.35).
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our findings, if it is feasible, continuous HHO is recommended for complex liver resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19621695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  8 in total

Review 1.  Portal triad clamping versus other methods of vascular control in liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur J Richardson; Jerome M Laurence; Vincent W T Lam
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  [Management of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding in liver surgery].

Authors:  R Sucher; D Seehofer; J Pratschke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elisabetta Moggia; Benjamin Rouse; Constantinos Simillis; Tianjing Li; Jessica Vaughan; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 4.  Hemihepatic versus total hepatic inflow occlusion during hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hai-Qing Wang; Jia-Yin Yang; Lu-Nan Yan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Image classification of liver cancer surrounding right hepatic pedicle and its guide to precise liver resection.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Chen; Wei-Dong Zhang; Dong Wang; Wei Cui; Yuan-Lin Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

6.  Central hepatectomy under sequential hemihepatic control.

Authors:  Nikolaos Arkadopoulos; Maria A Kyriazi; Kassiani Theodoraki; Pantelis Vassiliou; Apostolos Perelas; Ioannis Vassiliou; Vassilios Smyrniotis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Intermittent Pringle Versus Continuous Half-Pringle Maneuver for Laparoscopic Liver Resections of Tumors in Segment 7.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Xiangyu Lu; Jian Xu; Hongji Yang; Xiaofan Deng; Kai Chen; Yunfei Chen
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Intermittent Pringle maneuver versus continuous hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion using extra-glissonian approach in laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Hongji Yang; Xiaofan Deng; Yunfei Chen; Shikai Zhu; Chen Kai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.