Literature DB >> 19620450

Comparison of the accuracy rates of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI of the knee in the diagnosis of meniscal tear.

Jeffrey W Grossman1, Arthur A De Smet, Kazuhiko Shinki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of 3-T MRI with that of 1.5-T MRI of the knee in the diagnosis of meniscal tear and to analyze the causes of diagnostic error.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and original MRI interpretations of 100 consecutive patients who underwent 3-T MRI of the knee and of 100 consecutive patients who underwent 1.5-T MRI of the knee to determine the accuracy of diagnoses of meniscal tear. Knee arthroscopy was the reference standard. We retrospectively reviewed all MRI diagnostic errors to determine the cause of the errors.
RESULTS: At arthroscopy, 109 medial and 77 lateral meniscal tears were identified in the 200 patients. With two abnormal MR images indicating a meniscal tear, the sensitivity and specificity for medial tear were 92.7% and 82.2% at 1.5-T MRI and 92.6% and 76.1% at 3-T MRI (p = 1.0, p = 0.61). The sensitivity and specificity for lateral tears were 68.4% and 95.2% at 1.5-T MRI and 69.2% and 91.8% at 3-T MRI (p = 1.0, p = 0.49). Of the false-positive diagnoses of medial meniscal tear, five of eight at 1.5 T and seven of 11 at 3 T were apparent peripheral longitudinal tears of the posterior horn. Fifteen of the 26 missed medial and lateral meniscal tears were not seen in retrospect even with knowledge of the tear type and location.
CONCLUSION: Allowing for sample size limitations, we found comparable accuracy of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI of the knee in the diagnosis of meniscal tear. The causes of false-positive and false-negative MRI diagnoses of meniscal tear are similar for 3-T and 1.5-T MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19620450     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.2101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

1.  Contribution of thin-slice (1 mm) axial proton density MR images for identification and classification of meniscal tears: correlative study with arthroscopy.

Authors:  G Gökalp; O F Nas; B Demirag; Z Yazici; G Savci
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Accuracy of 3-T MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging to detect meniscal tears of the knee.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Jun Zhao; Yaming Wen; Bin Xie; Xuanling Zhou; Lin Guo; Liu Yang; Jian Wang; Yongming Dai; Daiquan Zhou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  The role of meniscal tissue in joint protection in early osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rene Verdonk; Henning Madry; Nogah Shabshin; Florian Dirisamer; Giuseppe M Peretti; Nicolas Pujol; Tim Spalding; Peter Verdonk; Romain Seil; Vincenzo Condello; Berardo Di Matteo; Johannes Zellner; Peter Angele
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating meniscal and cartilage injuries in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees.

Authors:  Kenneth Pak Leung Wong; Audrey XinYun Han; Jeannie Leh Ying Wong; Dave Yee Han Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Epiphyseal stress fractures of finger phalanges in adolescent climbing athletes: a 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Thomas Bayer; Volker Rainer Schöffl; Markus Lenhart; Thomas Herold
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Correlation of histological examination of meniscus with MR images: focused on high signal intensity of the meniscus not caused by definite meniscal tear and impact on mr diagnosis of tears.

Authors:  Chun Ai Li; Min Ki Kim; In Hwan Kim; Ju Hong Lee; Kyu Yun Jang; Sang Yong Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Evaluation of the relationship between the femoro-tibial angle and meniscal injury.

Authors:  Mehmet Sirik
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2017-10-19

Review 8.  Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating lesions of the knee: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA-compliant article).

Authors:  Qi Cheng; Feng-Chao Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Analysis of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners for Evaluation of Knee Pathology Based on Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher S Lee; Shane M Davis; Claire McGroder; William B Stetson; Scott E Powell
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-05

10.  Traumatic Meniscus and Cruciate Ligament Tears in Young Patients: A Comparison of 3T Versus 1.5T MRI.

Authors:  Nasreddine Nouri; Mouna Chelli Bouaziz; Hend Riahi; Meriem Mechri; Abdelhakim Kherfani; Moez Ouertatani; Mohamed Fethi Ladeb
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 1.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.