BACKGROUND: HIV-1 genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility testing (GPT) optimizes antiretroviral selection, but its effect on survival is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between GPT and survival. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: 10 U.S. HIV clinics. PATIENTS: 2699 HIV-infected patients eligible for GPT (plasma HIV RNA level >1000 copies/mL) seen from 1999 through 2005. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics, clinical factors, GPT use, all-cause mortality, and crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of GPT with survival. RESULTS: Patients were followed for a median of 3.3 years; 915 (34%) had GPT. Patients who had GPT had lower mortality rates than those who did not (2.0 vs. 2.7 deaths per 100 person-years). In standard Cox models, GPT was associated with improved survival (adjusted HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.94]; P = 0.017) after controlling for demographic characteristics, CD4+ cell count, HIV RNA level, and intensity of clinical follow-up. In subgroup analyses, GPT was associated with improved survival for the 2107 highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-experienced patients (2.2 vs. 3.2 deaths per 100 person-years for patients who had GPT vs. those who did not have GPT; adjusted HR, 0.60 [CI, 0.43 to 0.82]; P = 0.002) and for the 921 triple antiretroviral class-experienced patients (2.1 vs. 3.1 deaths per 100 person-years; adjusted HR, 0.61 [CI 0.40 to 0.93]; P = 0.022). Marginal structural models supported associations between GPT and improved survival in the overall cohort (adjusted HR, 0.54; P = 0.001) and in the HAART-experienced group (adjusted HR, 0.56; P = 0.003). LIMITATIONS: Use of GPT was not randomized. Residual confounding may exist. CONCLUSION: Use of GPT was independently associated with improved survival among HAART-experienced patients. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
BACKGROUND:HIV-1 genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility testing (GPT) optimizes antiretroviral selection, but its effect on survival is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between GPT and survival. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: 10 U.S. HIV clinics. PATIENTS: 2699 HIV-infectedpatients eligible for GPT (plasma HIV RNA level >1000 copies/mL) seen from 1999 through 2005. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics, clinical factors, GPT use, all-cause mortality, and crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of GPT with survival. RESULTS:Patients were followed for a median of 3.3 years; 915 (34%) had GPT. Patients who had GPT had lower mortality rates than those who did not (2.0 vs. 2.7 deaths per 100 person-years). In standard Cox models, GPT was associated with improved survival (adjusted HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.94]; P = 0.017) after controlling for demographic characteristics, CD4+ cell count, HIV RNA level, and intensity of clinical follow-up. In subgroup analyses, GPT was associated with improved survival for the 2107 highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-experienced patients (2.2 vs. 3.2 deaths per 100 person-years for patients who had GPT vs. those who did not have GPT; adjusted HR, 0.60 [CI, 0.43 to 0.82]; P = 0.002) and for the 921 triple antiretroviral class-experienced patients (2.1 vs. 3.1 deaths per 100 person-years; adjusted HR, 0.61 [CI 0.40 to 0.93]; P = 0.022). Marginal structural models supported associations between GPT and improved survival in the overall cohort (adjusted HR, 0.54; P = 0.001) and in the HAART-experienced group (adjusted HR, 0.56; P = 0.003). LIMITATIONS: Use of GPT was not randomized. Residual confounding may exist. CONCLUSION: Use of GPT was independently associated with improved survival among HAART-experienced patients. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Authors: Mary Morrow; Samantha MaWhinney; Ryan P Coyle; Stacey S Coleman; Edward M Gardner; Jia-Hua Zheng; Lucas Ellison; Lane R Bushman; Jennifer J Kiser; Peter L Anderson; Jose R Castillo-Mancilla Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Charles Hicks; Patrick Clay; Robert Redfield; Jay Lalezari; Ralph Liporace; Stefan Schneider; Michael Sension; MaryPeace McRae; Jean-Pierre Laurent Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Robert W Platt; M Alan Brookhart; Stephen R Cole; Daniel Westreich; Enrique F Schisterman Journal: Stat Med Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Charles S Morrison; Pai-Lien Chen; Cynthia Kwok; Barbra A Richardson; Tsungai Chipato; Roy Mugerwa; Josaphat Byamugisha; Nancy Padian; David D Celentano; Robert A Salata Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-07-17 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Jean B Nachega; Vincent C Marconi; Gert U van Zyl; Edward M Gardner; Wolfgang Preiser; Steven Y Hong; Edward J Mills; Robert Gross Journal: Infect Disord Drug Targets Date: 2011-04
Authors: Steven Y Hong; Jean B Nachega; Karen Kelley; Silvia Bertagnolio; Vincent C Marconi; Michael R Jordan Journal: Infect Disord Drug Targets Date: 2011-04
Authors: Flávia Vanesca Felix Leão; Regina Célia de Menezes Succi; Daisy Maria Machado; Aída de Fátima Thomé Barbosa Gouvêa; Fabiana Bononi do Carmo; Suenia Vasconcelos Beltrão; Maria Aparecida de Paula Cançado; João Tomas de Abreu Carvalhaes Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Kate Buchacz; Carl Armon; Frank J Palella; Richard M Novak; Jack Fuhrer; Ellen Tedaldi; Douglas Ward; Cynthia Mayer; Linda Battalora; Kimberly Carlson; Stacey Purinton; Marcus Durham; Jun Li Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-04-11 Impact factor: 3.835