OBJECTIVE: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) proposed a revision to the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC-6) staging system for non-small cell lung cancer. The goal of our study was to compare these systems in patients undergoing surgery for non-small cell lung cancer to determine whether one system is superior in staging operable disease. METHODS: Pathologic stages in 1154 patients undergoing complete resection over a 9-year period were analyzed. Patients were assigned a stage based on both IASLC and UICC-6 systems. We tested for statistically meaningful differences between the two staging systems using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the permutation test. RESULTS: The IASLC system is more effective than the UICC-6 system at ordering and differentiating patients (P = .009). Application of the IASLC system resulted in 202 (17.5%) patients being reassigned to a different stage (P = .012), with the most common shifts occurring from IB to IIA and IIIB to IIIA. The 5-year and median survivals of the IASLC IIIA patients including those shifted from the UICC-6 IIIB were 37% and 35 months, respectively. Reclassifying UICC-6 IIIB to IASLC IIIA did not reduce survival for the newly characterized IIIA cohort. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that the proposed IASLC staging system is more effective at differentiating stage than the UICC-6 system. Reclassifying patients from UICC-6 IIIB to IASLC IIIA will shift some patients from a stage previously considered unresectable to a stage frequently offered surgical resection. Further study and validation of the IASLC system are warranted.
OBJECTIVE: The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) proposed a revision to the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC-6) staging system for non-small cell lung cancer. The goal of our study was to compare these systems in patients undergoing surgery for non-small cell lung cancer to determine whether one system is superior in staging operable disease. METHODS: Pathologic stages in 1154 patients undergoing complete resection over a 9-year period were analyzed. Patients were assigned a stage based on both IASLC and UICC-6 systems. We tested for statistically meaningful differences between the two staging systems using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the permutation test. RESULTS: The IASLC system is more effective than the UICC-6 system at ordering and differentiating patients (P = .009). Application of the IASLC system resulted in 202 (17.5%) patients being reassigned to a different stage (P = .012), with the most common shifts occurring from IB to IIA and IIIB to IIIA. The 5-year and median survivals of the IASLC IIIA patients including those shifted from the UICC-6 IIIB were 37% and 35 months, respectively. Reclassifying UICC-6 IIIB to IASLC IIIA did not reduce survival for the newly characterized IIIA cohort. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that the proposed IASLC staging system is more effective at differentiating stage than the UICC-6 system. Reclassifying patients from UICC-6 IIIB to IASLC IIIA will shift some patients from a stage previously considered unresectable to a stage frequently offered surgical resection. Further study and validation of the IASLC system are warranted.
Authors: Jean-Yves Douillard; Rafael Rosell; Mario De Lena; Francesco Carpagnano; Rodryg Ramlau; Jose Luis Gonzáles-Larriba; Tomasz Grodzki; Jose Rodrigues Pereira; Alain Le Groumellec; Vito Lorusso; Claude Clary; Antonio J Torres; Jabrail Dahabreh; Pierre-Jean Souquet; Julio Astudillo; Pierre Fournel; Angel Artal-Cortes; Jacek Jassem; Leona Koubkova; Patricia His; Marcello Riggi; Patrick Hurteloup Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Pieter E Postmus; Elisabeth Brambilla; Kari Chansky; John Crowley; Peter Goldstraw; Edward F Patz; Hiroyasu Yokomise Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Wayne Hofstetter; Arlene M Correa; Neby Bekele; Jaffer A Ajani; Alexandria Phan; Ritsuko R Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; Dipen Maru; Tsung T Wu; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Jack A Roth; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Ashleigh Francis; Shanda Blackmon; Stephen G Swisher Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Ramón Rami-Porta; David Ball; John Crowley; Dorothy J Giroux; James Jett; William D Travis; Masahiro Tsuboi; Eric Vallières; Peter Goldstraw Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Haris Zahoor; James D Luketich; Benny Weksler; Daniel G Winger; Neil A Christie; Ryan M Levy; Michael K Gibson; Jon M Davison; Katie S Nason Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Rachel M Ostroff; William L Bigbee; Wilbur Franklin; Larry Gold; Mike Mehan; York E Miller; Harvey I Pass; William N Rom; Jill M Siegfried; Alex Stewart; Jeffrey J Walker; Joel L Weissfeld; Stephen Williams; Dom Zichi; Edward N Brody Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael R Mehan; Deborah Ayers; Derek Thirstrup; Wei Xiong; Rachel M Ostroff; Edward N Brody; Jeffrey J Walker; Larry Gold; Thale C Jarvis; Nebojsa Janjic; Geoffrey S Baird; Sheri K Wilcox Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 3.240