UNLABELLED: The time course of muscle .V(O2) recovery from contractions (i.e., muscle .V(O2) off-kinetics), measured directly at the site of O(2) exchange, i.e., in the microcirculation, is unknown. Whereas biochemical models based upon creatine kinase flux rates predict slower .V(O2) off- than on-transients [Kushmerick, M.J., 1998. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B: Biochem. Mol. Biol.], whole muscle .V(O2) data [Krustrup, et al. J. Physiol.] suggest on-off symmetry. PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that the slowed recovery blood flow (Qm) kinetics profile in the spinotrapezius muscle [Ferreira et al., 2006. J. Physiol.] was associated with a slowed muscle .V(O2) recovery compared with that seen at the onset of contractions (time constant, tau approximately 23s, Behnke et al., 2002. Resp. Physiol.), i.e., on-off asymmetry. METHODS: Measurements of capillary red blood cell flux and microvascular pressure of O(2) (P(O2) mv) were combined to resolve the temporal profile of muscle .V(O2) across the moderate intensity contractions-to-rest transition. RESULTS: Muscle .V(O2) decreased from an end-contracting value of 7.7+/-0.2 ml/100 g/min to 1.7+/-0.1 ml/100g/min at the end of the 3 min recovery period, which was not different from pre-stimulation .V(O2). Contrary to our hypothesis, muscle .V(O2) in recovery began to decrease immediately (i.e., time delay <2s) and demonstrated rapid first-order kinetics (tau, 25.5+/-2.6s) not different (i.e., symmetrical to) to those during the on-transient. This resulted in a systematic increase in microvascular P(O2) during the recovery from contractions. CONCLUSIONS: The slowed Qm kinetics in recovery serves to elevate the Qm/.V(O2) ratio and thus microvascular P(O2) . Whether this Qm response is obligatory to the rapid muscle .V(O2) kinetics and hence speeds the repletion of high-energy phosphates by maximizing conductive and diffusive O(2) flux is an important question that awaits resolution.
UNLABELLED: The time course of muscle .V(O2) recovery from contractions (i.e., muscle .V(O2) off-kinetics), measured directly at the site of O(2) exchange, i.e., in the microcirculation, is unknown. Whereas biochemical models based upon creatine kinase flux rates predict slower .V(O2) off- than on-transients [Kushmerick, M.J., 1998. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B: Biochem. Mol. Biol.], whole muscle .V(O2) data [Krustrup, et al. J. Physiol.] suggest on-off symmetry. PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that the slowed recovery blood flow (Qm) kinetics profile in the spinotrapezius muscle [Ferreira et al., 2006. J. Physiol.] was associated with a slowed muscle .V(O2) recovery compared with that seen at the onset of contractions (time constant, tau approximately 23s, Behnke et al., 2002. Resp. Physiol.), i.e., on-off asymmetry. METHODS: Measurements of capillary red blood cell flux and microvascular pressure of O(2) (P(O2) mv) were combined to resolve the temporal profile of muscle .V(O2) across the moderate intensity contractions-to-rest transition. RESULTS: Muscle .V(O2) decreased from an end-contracting value of 7.7+/-0.2 ml/100 g/min to 1.7+/-0.1 ml/100g/min at the end of the 3 min recovery period, which was not different from pre-stimulation .V(O2). Contrary to our hypothesis, muscle .V(O2) in recovery began to decrease immediately (i.e., time delay <2s) and demonstrated rapid first-order kinetics (tau, 25.5+/-2.6s) not different (i.e., symmetrical to) to those during the on-transient. This resulted in a systematic increase in microvascular P(O2) during the recovery from contractions. CONCLUSIONS: The slowed Qm kinetics in recovery serves to elevate the Qm/.V(O2) ratio and thus microvascular P(O2) . Whether this Qm response is obligatory to the rapid muscle .V(O2) kinetics and hence speeds the repletion of high-energy phosphates by maximizing conductive and diffusive O(2) flux is an important question that awaits resolution.
Authors: L F Ferreira; K S Hageman; S A Hahn; J Williams; D J Padilla; D C Poole; T I Musch Journal: Acta Physiol (Oxf) Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 6.311
Authors: Brad J Behnke; Danielle J Padilla; Leonardo F Ferreira; Michael D Delp; Timothy I Musch; David C Poole Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2005-11-10
Authors: Leonardo F Ferreira; Allison J Harper; Dana K Townsend; Barbara J Lutjemeier; Thomas J Barstow Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2005-05-20 Impact factor: 2.969
Authors: Philip S Clifford; Heidi A Kluess; Jason J Hamann; John B Buckwalter; Jeffrey L Jasperse Journal: J Physiol Date: 2006-02-23 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Daniel M Hirai; Jesse C Craig; Trenton D Colburn; Hiroaki Eshima; Yutaka Kano; Timothy I Musch; David C Poole Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2019-08-01
Authors: Daniela M Bravo; Ana Cristina Gimenes; Rúbia B Nascimento; Eloara V M Ferreira; Ana Cristina B Siqueira; Ethiane D S Meda; J Alberto Neder; Luiz Eduardo Nery Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2011-09-04 Impact factor: 3.078