Literature DB >> 19619223

Adaptation to different rates of environmental change in Chlamydomonas.

Sinéad Collins1, Juliette de Meaux.   

Abstract

We investigate how different rates of environmental change affect adaptive outcomes and dynamics by selecting Chlamydomonas populations for over 200 generations in environments where the rate of change varies. We find that slower rates of environmental change result in end populations that grow faster and pay a lower cost of adaptation than populations that adapt to a sudden change of the same magnitude. We detected partial selective sweeps in adapting populations by monitoring changes in marker frequency in each population. Although populations adapting to a sudden environmental change showed evidence of mutations of large effect segregating early on, populations adapting to slow rates of change showed patterns that were consistent with mutations of relatively small effect occurring at less predictable times. This work suggests that rates of environmental change may fundamentally alter adaptive dynamics and outcomes of adaptation by changing the size and timing of fitness increases. We suggest that using mutations of smaller effect during adaptation may result in lower levels of pleiotropy and historical constraints, which could in turn result in higher fitness by the end of the experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19619223     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00770.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  24 in total

1.  Rapid eco-evolutionary responses in perturbed phytoplankton communities.

Authors:  Geneviève Thibodeau; David A Walsh; Beatrix E Beisner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Rate of novel host invasion affects adaptability of evolving RNA virus lineages.

Authors:  Valerie J Morley; Sandra Y Mendiola; Paul E Turner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The genetic basis of phenotypic adaptation II: the distribution of adaptive substitutions in the moving optimum model.

Authors:  Michael Kopp; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Climate change and evolutionary adaptation.

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Bram Van den Bergh; Toon Swings; Maarten Fauvart; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Evolutionary rescue from extinction is contingent on a lower rate of environmental change.

Authors:  Haley A Lindsey; Jenna Gallie; Susan Taylor; Benjamin Kerr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Is adaptation to climate change really constrained in niche specialists?

Authors:  Belinda van Heerwaarden; Carla M Sgrò
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Factors influencing the effect size distribution of adaptive substitutions.

Authors:  Emily L Dittmar; Christopher G Oakley; Jeffrey K Conner; Billie A Gould; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter.

Authors:  Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Adaptation and competition in deteriorating environments.

Authors:  Romana Limberger; Gregor F Fussmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.