Literature DB >> 19619065

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: current evaluation of surgical margins in clinically low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer.

David S Yee1, Navneet Narula, Mahul B Amin, Douglas W Skarecky, Thomas E Ahlering.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Concern exists over a lack of tactile sensation and positive surgical margins (PSMs) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. We report our PSM rates in our most current 500 cases and particularly in clinically high-risk disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After implementation of our present technique at case #251, we report PSM rates according to pathologic stage and D'Amico's risk stratification: low risk (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] <10, Gleason score [GS] 5-6, cT1-T2A), intermediate risk (PSA 10-20, GS 7, cT2B), and high risk (PSA >20, GS 8-10, cT3). Patients with cT2b/T3 disease or GS 8 to 10 and multiple cores with >30% involvement underwent wide excision of the neurovascular bundle. PSM was defined as ink on tumor.
RESULTS: The overall PSM rate was 7.4%: pT2 = 3.1%, pT3 = 15.9%, and pT4 = 55.6%. PSMs occurred in 13 (4.9%) low, 10 (5.8%) intermediate, and 14 (22.6%) high D'Amico risk patients. Of the 62 high-risk patients, the median PSA was 6.9 (range 2.2-97.9); biopsy GS was 6 to 7 (26%) and 8 to 10 (74%). For preoperatively palpable disease, the PSM rate was 9.9%: cT1 = 6.0%, cT2 = 7.7%, and cT3 = 26.3%. No PSMs occurred along the neurovascular bundle.
CONCLUSION: Since 2005, 500 men with clinically low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer have undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with acceptable surgical margin rates. In patients with high-risk and usually palpable disease, PSM rates were also acceptable despite the lack of tactile sensation with the robot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19619065     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

1.  The IDEAL recommendations and urological innovation.

Authors:  Peter McCulloch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: technical considerations and review of the literature.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2011-09-25

3.  Frequency of positive surgical margin at prostatectomy and its effect on patient outcome.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-09

4.  Role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the management of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Wooju Jeong; Deepansh Dalela; Dane E Klett; Firas Abdollah; Jesse D Sammon; Mani Menon; Mahendra Bhandari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10

Review 5.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives.

Authors:  Abdullah Erdem Canda; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  RARP in high-risk prostate cancer: use of multi-parametric MRI and nerve sparing techniques.

Authors:  Jin-Guo Wang; Jiaoti Huang; Arnold I Chin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  The surgical learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single surgeon with 500 cases in Taiwan, China.

Authors:  Yen-Chuan Ou; Chun-Kuang Yang; Kuangh-Si Chang; John Wang; Siu-Wan Hung; Min-Che Tung; Ashutosh K Tewari; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.