OBJECTIVE: There has been an abundance of research evaluating prenatal and postnatal smoking abstinence programs. However, few researchers have tested postpartum relapse interventions that address secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. Pregnant women exposed to SHS are more likely to relapse. This article explores the similarities and differences among postpartum interventions that incorporate SHS education. Generating knowledge about the components of postpartum relapse prevention interventions that do and do not achieve prolongation of abstinence is integral to the development of effective SHS interventions that help women achieve lifelong abstinence. METHODS: We used a methodological review of 11 randomized, controlled trials testing the efficacy of relapse prevention interventions that address SHS exposure. We compared intervention strength, biomarker validation of home smoking and SHS, as well as abstinence and relapse rates. We examined three predictors of postpartum relapse: (1) partner smoking in the home, (2) adoption of home smoking restrictions, and (3) motivation/confidence to remain abstinent. RESULTS: Findings revealed a need for more comprehensive SHS interventions and a clear delineation of abstinence/relapse terminology. Biomarker validation of home smoking and SHS was primarily measured by self-report, passive nicotine monitors, and hair nicotine levels. Furthermore, studies using nurse- and pediatrician-led interventions resulted in the lowest relapse rates. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive intervention that specifically prioritizes parental education on the health effects of SHS on the family, empowerment of the mother and family members to remain abstinent and adopt a smoke-free home smoking policy, and partner influence on smoking could result in a significant reduction in postpartum relapse rates.
OBJECTIVE: There has been an abundance of research evaluating prenatal and postnatal smoking abstinence programs. However, few researchers have tested postpartum relapse interventions that address secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure. Pregnant women exposed to SHS are more likely to relapse. This article explores the similarities and differences among postpartum interventions that incorporate SHS education. Generating knowledge about the components of postpartum relapse prevention interventions that do and do not achieve prolongation of abstinence is integral to the development of effective SHS interventions that help women achieve lifelong abstinence. METHODS: We used a methodological review of 11 randomized, controlled trials testing the efficacy of relapse prevention interventions that address SHS exposure. We compared intervention strength, biomarker validation of home smoking and SHS, as well as abstinence and relapse rates. We examined three predictors of postpartum relapse: (1) partner smoking in the home, (2) adoption of home smoking restrictions, and (3) motivation/confidence to remain abstinent. RESULTS: Findings revealed a need for more comprehensive SHS interventions and a clear delineation of abstinence/relapse terminology. Biomarker validation of home smoking and SHS was primarily measured by self-report, passive nicotine monitors, and hair nicotine levels. Furthermore, studies using nurse- and pediatrician-led interventions resulted in the lowest relapse rates. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive intervention that specifically prioritizes parental education on the health effects of SHS on the family, empowerment of the mother and family members to remain abstinent and adopt a smoke-free home smoking policy, and partner influence on smoking could result in a significant reduction in postpartum relapse rates.
Authors: R H Secker-Walker; L J Solomon; B S Flynn; J M Skelly; S S Lepage; G D Goodwin; P B Mead Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 1995 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Paul Wileyto; Freda Patterson; Raymond Niaura; Leonard Epstein; Richard Brown; Janet Audrain-McGovern; Larry Hawk; Caryn Lerman; Freda Patterson Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Vani Nath Simmons; Steven K Sutton; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cathy D Meade; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kristin Ashford; Emily Rayens; Amanda T Wiggins; Mary Kay Rayens; Amanda Fallin; Molly Malany Sayre Journal: Public Health Nurs Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 1.462
Authors: Kuang-Yi Wen; Suzanne M Miller; Pagona Roussi; Tanisha D Belton; Jayson Baman; Linda Kilby; Enrique Hernandez Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2014-08-06
Authors: Caitlin Notley; Tracey J Brown; Linda Bauld; Wendy Hardeman; Richard Holland; Felix Naughton; Sophie Orton; Michael Ussher Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennah M Sontag; Binu Singh; Barbara M Ostfeld; Thomas Hegyi; Michael B Steinberg; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kuang-Yi Wen; Suzanne M Miller; Linda Kilby; Linda Fleisher; Tanisha D Belton; Gem Roy; Enrique Hernandez Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2014-04-03