Literature DB >> 19618295

Distributing responsibility in the debate on sustainable biofuels.

Laurens Landeweerd1, Patricia Osseweijer, Julian Kinderlerer.   

Abstract

In the perception of technology innovation two world views compete for domination: technological and social determinism. Technological determinism holds that societal change is caused by technological developments, social determinism holds the opposite. Although both were quite central to discussion in the philosophy, history and sociology of technology in the 1970s and 1980s, neither is seen as mainstream now. They do still play an important role as background philosophies in societal debates and offer two very different perspectives on where the responsibilities for an ethically sound development of novel technologies lie. In this paper we will elaborate on these to two opposing views on technology development taking the recent debate on the implementation of biofuels as a case example.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19618295     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9154-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  1 in total

1.  What next after determinism in the ontology of technology? Distributing responsibility in the biofuel debate.

Authors:  Philip Boucher
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.