Literature DB >> 19617582

Predicting hospital surge after a large-scale anthrax attack: a model-based analysis of CDC's cities readiness initiative prophylaxis recommendations.

Nathaniel Hupert1, Daniel Wattson, Jason Cuomo, Eric Hollingsworth, Kristof Neukermans, Wei Xiong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A CRI-compliant prophylaxis campaign starting 2 days after exposure would protect from 86% to 87% of exposed individuals from illness (assuming, in the base case, 90% antibiotic effectiveness and a 95% attack rate). Each additional day needed to complete the campaign would result in, on average, 2.4% to 2.9% more hospitalizations in the exposed population; each additional day's delay to initiating prophylaxis beyond 2 days would result in 5.2% to 6.5% additional hospitalizations. These population protection estimates vary roughly proportionally to antibiotic effectiveness but are relatively insensitive to variations in anthrax incubation period.
CONCLUSION: . Delays in detecting and initiating response to large-scale, covert aerosol anthrax releases in a major city would render even highly effective CRI-compliant mass prophylaxis campaigns unable to prevent unsustainable levels of surge hospitalizations. Although outcomes may improve with more rapid epidemiological identification of affected subpopulations and increased collaboration across regional public health and hospital systems, these findings support an increased focus on prevention of this public health threat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19617582     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09341389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of back-calculation techniques and their potential to inform mitigation strategies with application to non-transmissible acute infectious diseases.

Authors:  Joseph R Egan; Ian M Hall
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  System-level planning, coordination, and communication: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Dichter; Robert K Kanter; David Dries; Valerie Luyckx; Matthew L Lim; John Wilgis; Michael R Anderson; Babak Sarani; Nathaniel Hupert; Ryan Mutter; Asha V Devereaux; Michael D Christian; Niranjan Kissoon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Best practice assessment of disease modelling for infectious disease outbreaks.

Authors:  Z F Dembek; T Chekol; A Wu
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Modeling Tool for Decision Support during Early Days of an Anthrax Event.

Authors:  Gabriel Rainisch; Martin I Meltzer; Sean Shadomy; William A Bower; Nathaniel Hupert
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 5.  Biowarfare and bioterrorism.

Authors:  Michael D Christian
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.598

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.