Literature DB >> 19616243

The protective role of renal parenchyma as a barrier to local tumor spread of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma and its impact on patient survival.

Jinsung Park1, Seong Heon Ha, Gyeng Eun Min, Cheryn Song, Bumsik Hong, Jun Hyuk Hong, Choung-Soo Kim, Hanjong Ahn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated whether tumor location has independent prognostic significance in upper tract transitional cell carcinoma cases and which factor determines it.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed data on 122 renal pelvis and 102 ureteral tumor cases, including the recurrence pattern. Tumor location and other clinicopathological variables were evaluated regarding cancer specific and recurrence-free survival. Stage pT3 tumors were stratified into those invading renal parenchyma or peripelvic/periureteral fat.
RESULTS: Overall 5-year cancer specific survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 77.0% and 71.6%, respectively, at a mean followup of 60.7 months. Of the clinicopathological parameters T stage was the most significant prognosticator of the survival rate, while nodal involvement, high grade and ureteral tumor location were also significant for lower survival rates. Stratification analysis for matching pathological stage revealed that, while survival rates were similar in the renal pelvis and ureteral tumor groups at stage pT2 or less, renal pelvic tumors were associated with significantly higher survival rates than ureteral tumors for stage pT3. Specifically renal pelvic tumors invading the renal parenchyma were associated with a lower local failure rate, and higher cancer specific and recurrence-free survival rates than tumors invading peripelvic or periureteral fat, ie 77.5% vs 49.7% 5-year cancer specific survival and 75.6% vs 32.0% 5-year recurrence-free survival (p = 0.014 and 0.003, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location is an independent prognostic factor for pT3 upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. The overall better prognosis of renal pelvic tumors was mainly attributable to pT3 tumor outcomes, specifically lesions invading the renal parenchyma. These findings may be due to the protective role of thick renal parenchyma against local tumor spread.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19616243     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

Review 1.  Distinct patterns and behaviour of urothelial carcinoma with respect to anatomical location: how molecular biomarkers can augment clinico-pathological predictors in upper urinary tract tumours.

Authors:  David R Yates; James W F Catto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Molecular profile of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: are pelvicalyceal and ureteral tumors different?

Authors:  Laura-Maria Krabbe; Aditya Bagrodia; Mary E Westerman; Bishoy A Gayed; Ahmed Q Haddad; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat; Payal Kapur; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Ureteral tumours showing a worse prognosis than renal pelvis tumours may be attributed to ureteral tumours more likely to have hydronephrosis and less likely to have haematuria.

Authors:  Xiaohua Zhang; Zhaowei Zhu; Shan Zhong; Tianyuan Xu; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Upper tract transitional cell carcinoma clinically mimicking inflammatory renal pathology: A report of three cases.

Authors:  Rahul Jena; Sanjoy Kumar Sureka; Uday Pratap Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  The effect of tumor location on prognosis in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Authors:  Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Daher C Chade; Guilherme Godoy; Ari Adamy; Matthew Kaag; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Preoperative hydronephrosis and diabetes mellitus predict poor prognosis in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Insang Hwang; Seung Il Jung; Deok-Hyun Nam; Eu Chang Hwang; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Soo Bang Ryu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Prognostic significance of tumor location and superficial urothelial bladder carcinoma history in patients with ureteral urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Jian-Ye Liu; Qun Zhang; Yun-Lin Ye; Jing Li; Wei Chen; Yong-Hong Li; Zhi-Ling Zhang; Kai Yao; Li-Juan Jiang; Hui Han; Zhou-Wei Liu; Zi-Ke Qin; Fang-Jian Zhou
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Peripelvic/periureteral fat invasion is independently associated with worse prognosis in pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Sejun Park; Cheryn Song; Jun Hyuk Hong; Choung-Soo Kim; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Tumor Location Based Segmentation in Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Impacts on the Urothelial Recurrence-Free Survival: A Multi-Institutional Database Study.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Hideyasu Matsuyama; Kazumasa Komura; Naokazu Ibuki; Kiyohide Fujimoto; Hiroaki Shiina; Shigeru Sakano; Kazuhiro Nagao; Hiroaki Mastumoto; Makito Miyake; Yoshihiro Tatsumi; Hiroaki Yasumoto; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-12-18

10.  Impact of Surgical Wait Time on Survival in Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma With Hydronephrosis.

Authors:  Fangzheng Zhao; Nienie Qi; Chu Zhang; Ning Xue; Shuaishuai Li; Raorao Zhou; Zeyu Chen; Ruiqin Yao; Haitao Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.