David A Levy1, Louis L Pisters, J Stephen Jones. 1. Department of Regional Urology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. Levyd3@ccf.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: We correlated nadir post-cryoablation prostate specific antigen with long-term biochemical disease-free survival in a risk stratified cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated with cryoablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 2,427 patients treated with cryoablation from the Cryo On-Line Data Registry were studied for biochemical disease-free survival based on nadir + 2 criteria using prostate specific antigen determinations out to 60 months after cryoablation. RESULTS: For nadir prostate specific antigen less than 0.1 ng/ml, the 36, 48 and 60-month biochemical disease-free survival was 93%, 91.8% and 91.8%, respectively, for low risk disease; 88%, 81% and 76%, respectively, for intermediate risk; and 82%, 76% and 71%, respectively, for high risk disease. For prostate specific antigen 0.1 to 0.5 ng/ml the 36, 48 and 60-month biochemical disease-free survival rates were 92%, 91.5% and 86%, respectively, for low risk; 78%, 72% and 67%, respectively, for intermediate risk; and 64%, 61% and 51%, respectively, for high risk disease. For a prostate specific antigen of 0.6 to 1.0 ng/ml the 24-month biochemical disease-free survival was 70.5% for low risk, 56.1% for intermediate risk and 46.7% for high risk disease. A prostate specific antigen of 1.1 to 2.5 ng/ml was associated with a 12-month failure rate of 29.6%, 38% and 74.8% for low, intermediate and high risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Nadir prostate specific antigen after prostate cryoablation is prognostic for biochemical disease-free survival. However, by itself it cannot be used as a definition of disease-free survival since it has not been correlated with disease specific or metastasis-free survival. A prostate specific antigen of 0.6 ng/ml or greater correlated with a 29.5% biochemical failure rate at 24 months regardless of risk stratification and, therefore, these cases require close followup.
PURPOSE: We correlated nadir post-cryoablation prostate specific antigen with long-term biochemical disease-free survival in a risk stratified cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated with cryoablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 2,427 patients treated with cryoablation from the Cryo On-Line Data Registry were studied for biochemical disease-free survival based on nadir + 2 criteria using prostate specific antigen determinations out to 60 months after cryoablation. RESULTS: For nadir prostate specific antigen less than 0.1 ng/ml, the 36, 48 and 60-month biochemical disease-free survival was 93%, 91.8% and 91.8%, respectively, for low risk disease; 88%, 81% and 76%, respectively, for intermediate risk; and 82%, 76% and 71%, respectively, for high risk disease. For prostate specific antigen 0.1 to 0.5 ng/ml the 36, 48 and 60-month biochemical disease-free survival rates were 92%, 91.5% and 86%, respectively, for low risk; 78%, 72% and 67%, respectively, for intermediate risk; and 64%, 61% and 51%, respectively, for high risk disease. For a prostate specific antigen of 0.6 to 1.0 ng/ml the 24-month biochemical disease-free survival was 70.5% for low risk, 56.1% for intermediate risk and 46.7% for high risk disease. A prostate specific antigen of 1.1 to 2.5 ng/ml was associated with a 12-month failure rate of 29.6%, 38% and 74.8% for low, intermediate and high risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Nadir prostate specific antigen after prostate cryoablation is prognostic for biochemical disease-free survival. However, by itself it cannot be used as a definition of disease-free survival since it has not been correlated with disease specific or metastasis-free survival. A prostate specific antigen of 0.6 ng/ml or greater correlated with a 29.5% biochemical failure rate at 24 months regardless of risk stratification and, therefore, these cases require close followup.
Authors: Henk van der Poel; Laurence Klotz; Gerald Andriole; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Anders Bjartell; Olivier Cussenot; Freddy Hamdy; Markus Graefen; Paolo Palma; Arturo Rodriguez Rivera; Christian G Stief Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: J G Baust; J C Bischof; S Jiang-Hughes; T J Polascik; D B Rukstalis; A A Gage; J M Baust Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Young Hwii Ko; Seok Ho Kang; Young Je Park; Hong Seok Park; Du Geon Moon; Jeong Gu Lee; Duck Ki Yoon; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon Journal: Asian J Androl Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 3.285