Literature DB >> 19616017

Cisplatin sensitivity is related to late DNA damage processing and checkpoint control rather than to the early DNA damage response.

Anamaria Brozovic1, Julia Damrot, Roman Tsaryk, Lars Helbig, Teodora Nikolova, Cornelia Hartig, Maja Osmak, Wynand Paul Roos, Bernd Kaina, Gerhard Fritz.   

Abstract

The present study aimed at elucidating mechanisms dictating cell death triggered by cisplatin-induced DNA damage. We show that CL-V5B hamster mutant cells, a derivative of V79B, are hypersensitive to cisplatin-induced apoptotic death. CL-V5B cells are characterized by attenuated cisplatin-induced early (2-6 h) stress response, such as phosphorylation of stress-activated protein kinases (SAPK/JNK), ATM and Rad3-related (ATR) protein kinase, histone H2AX and checkpoint kinase-1 (Chk-1). Human FANCC cells also showed a reduced phosphorylation of H2AX and SAPK/JNK at early time point after cisplatin treatment. This was not the case for BRCA2-defective VC-8 hamster cells, indicating that the FA core complex, rather than its downstream elements, is involved in early damage response. The alleviated early response of CL-V5B cells is not due to a general dysfunction in ATM/ATR-regulated signaling. It is rather due to a reduced formation of primary cisplatin-DNA adducts in the hypersensitive mutant as shown by analysis of DNA platination, DNA intra- and interstrand crosslink formation and DNA replication blockage. Despite of lower initial DNA damage and attenuated early DNA damage response (DDR), CL-V5B cells are characterized by an excessive G2/M arrest as well as an elevated frequency of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and chromosomal aberrations (CA) at late times (16-24h) after cisplatin exposure. This indicates that error-prone processing of cisplatin-induced lesions, notably interstrand crosslinks (ICL), and the formation of secondary DNA lesions (i.e. DSB), results in a powerful delayed DNA damage response and massive pro-apoptotic signaling in CL-V5B cells. The data provide an example that the initial level of cisplatin-DNA adducts and the corresponding early DNA damage response do not necessarily predict the outcome of cisplatin treatment. Rather, the accuracy of DNA damage processing and late checkpoint control mechanisms determine the extent of cell death triggered by cisplatin-induced DNA lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19616017     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  19 in total

1.  PARP inhibition selectively increases sensitivity to cisplatin in ERCC1-low non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Haiying Cheng; Zhenfeng Zhang; Alain Borczuk; Charles A Powell; Adayabalam S Balajee; Howard B Lieberman; Balazs Halmos
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Fanconi anemia gene editing by the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Authors:  Mark J Osborn; Richard Gabriel; Beau R Webber; Anthony P DeFeo; Amber N McElroy; Jordan Jarjour; Colby G Starker; John E Wagner; J Keith Joung; Daniel F Voytas; Christof von Kalle; Manfred Schmidt; Bruce R Blazar; Jakub Tolar
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.695

3.  Cisplatin associated with LY294002 increases cytotoxicity and induces changes in transcript profiles of glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  P O Carminati; F S Donaires; M M Marques; E A Donadi; G A S Passos; E T Sakamoto-Hojo
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Cisplatin plus sodium arsenite and hyperthermia induces pseudo-G1 associated apoptotic cell death in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Clarisse S Muenyi; Abhaya P Trivedi; C William Helm; J Christopher States
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Mechanism of cell death resulting from DNA interstrand cross-linking in mammalian cells.

Authors:  T Osawa; D Davies; J A Hartley
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 8.469

6.  Inhibition of ERβ induces resistance to cisplatin by enhancing Rad51-mediated DNA repair in human medulloblastoma cell lines.

Authors:  Anna Wilk; Agnieszka Waligorska; Piotr Waligorski; Augusto Ochoa; Krzysztof Reiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  FOXM1 confers acquired cisplatin resistance in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Jimmy M-M Kwok; Barrie Peck; Lara J Monteiro; Helma D C Schwenen; Julie Millour; R Charles Coombes; Stephen S Myatt; Eric W-F Lam
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 5.852

8.  RAD52 variants predict platinum resistance and prognosis of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ting-Yan Shi; Gong Yang; Xiao-Yu Tu; Jing-Min Yang; Ji Qian; Xiao-Hua Wu; Xiao-Yan Zhou; Xi Cheng; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  WEE1 kinase polymorphism as a predictive biomarker for efficacy of platinum-gemcitabine doublet chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Di Liu; Chunyan Wu; Yuli Jiao; Likun Hou; Daru Lu; Hui Zheng; Chang Chen; Ji Qian; Ke Fei; Bo Su
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Endoplasmic reticulum stress is involved in the response of human laryngeal carcinoma cells to Carboplatin but is absent in Carboplatin-resistant cells.

Authors:  Anamaria Brozovic; Lidija Vuković; Darija Stupin Polančac; Istvan Arany; Beate Köberle; Gerhard Fritz; Zeljka Fiket; Dragomira Majhen; Andreja Ambriović-Ristov; Maja Osmak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.