Literature DB >> 19615810

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: 8 years experience.

R Granese1, M Candiani, A Perino, F Romano, G Cucinella.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. STUDY
DESIGN: Between January 1999 and January 2007, 165 laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy procedures, using a polypropylene mesh, were performed on women affected by vaginal vault prolapse. Intraoperative complications included: 5 bladder injuries and 3 sigmoid perforations. Postoperative complications included: 10 cases of fever, 5 cases of lumbosciatica, 15 cases of detrusor overactivity, 2 cases of vaginal haematoma, and 5 cases of minimal dispareunia. At 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery, a clinical evaluation was carried out for all patients. After this period, we contacted the women annually.
RESULTS: We treated 165 women, with an average age of 67 (range 58-76 years; S.D. 19.22), average parity of 3 (range 2-5), and average body mass index of 28 (range 24-30). In many of them, more than one additional procedure was performed. At a median follow-up of 43 months (range 6-96 months), out of a total of 138 patients (27 were lost at follow-up), we obtained successful treatment in 131 women (success rate of 94.9%), with a high rate of satisfaction from the procedure. Recurrent vaginal vault prolapse was registered in seven women (5.07%): in 3, the vaginal vault collapsed after a period ranging from 7 to 20 days, caused by the use of a Vyprol mesh (hence use of same was suspended), and in a further three women the mesh detached after less than 1 month. Finally, in one case, we reported an erosion between the first and the second follow-up and the mesh was visualized in the vagina.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, in the hands of an expert surgeon, can be considered a safe, effective procedure for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse, allowing long-term anatomical restoration (94.9% success rate).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19615810     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  13 in total

Review 1.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

3.  A novel technique for the management of advanced uterine/vault prolapse: extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Fikret Fatih Onol; Erdal Kaya; Osman Köse; Sinasi Yavuz Onol
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years.

Authors:  David Vandendriessche; Julie Sussfeld; Géraldine Giraudet; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Hélène Behal; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Apical prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  S Manodoro; E Werbrouck; J Veldman; K Haest; R Corona; F Claerhout; G Coremans; D De Ridder; F Spelzini; J Deprest
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2011

7.  Nerve preserving vs standard laparoscopic sacropexy: Postoperative bowel function.

Authors:  Stefano Cosma; Paolo Petruzzelli; Saverio Danese; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-05-16

8.  Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chunbo Li; Zhiyuan Dai; Huimin Shu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.

Authors:  Femke van Zanten; Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten; Egbert Lenters; Steven E Schraffordt Koops
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Reconstructive laparoscopic prolapse surgery to avoid mesh erosions.

Authors:  Rajesh Devassy; Cristina Cezar; Meiting Xie; Anja Herrmann; Garri Tchartchian; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2013-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.