Literature DB >> 19615629

Current funding and financing issues in the Australian hospice and palliative care sector.

Robert Gordon1, Kathy Eagar, David Currow, Janette Green.   

Abstract

This article overviews current funding and financing issues in the Australian hospice and palliative care sector. Within Australia, the major responsibilities for managing the health care system are shared between two levels of government. Funding arrangements vary according to the type of care. The delivery of palliative care services is a State/Territory responsibility. Recently, almost all States/Territories have developed overarching frameworks to guide the development of palliative care policies, including funding and service delivery structures. Palliative care services in Australia comprise a mix of specialist providers, generalist providers, and support services in the public, nongovernment, and private sectors. The National Palliative Care Strategy is a joint strategy of the Commonwealth and States that commenced in 2002 and includes a number of major issues. Following a national study in 1996, the Australian National Subacute and Nonacute Patient (AN-SNAP) system was endorsed as the national casemix classification for subacute and nonacute care. Funding for palliative care services varies depending on the type of service and the setting in which it is provided. There is no national model for funding inpatient or community services, which is a State/Territory responsibility. A summary of funding arrangements is provided in this article. Palliative care continues to evolve at a rapid rate in Australia. Increasingly flexible evidence-based models of care delivery are emerging. This article argues that it will be critical for equally flexible funding and financing models to be developed. Furthermore, it is critical that palliative care patients can be identified, classified, and costed. Casemix classifications such as AN-SNAP represent an important starting point but further work is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19615629     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  4 in total

1.  A Qualitative Study of Medical Oncologists' Experiences of Their Profession and Workforce Sustainability.

Authors:  Alex Broom; W K Tim Wong; Emma Kirby; David Sibbritt; Deme Karikios; Rosemary Harrup; Zarnie Lwin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Redefining diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for palliative care - a cross-sectional study in two German centres.

Authors:  Matthias Vogl; Eva Schildmann; Reiner Leidl; Farina Hodiamont; Helen Kalies; Bernd Oliver Maier; Marcus Schlemmer; Susanne Roller; Claudia Bausewein
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 3.  Aligning policy objectives and payment design in palliative care.

Authors:  Stephen Duckett
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 4.  Access to palliative care: discrepancy among low-income and high-income countries.

Authors:  Arjun Poudel; Bhuvan Kc; Shakti Shrestha; Lisa Nissen
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.413

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.