| Literature DB >> 19615089 |
Pushpa Lata1, Siya Ram, Madhoolika Agrawal, Rishi Shanker.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surface waters quality has declined in developing countries due to rapid industrialization and population growth. The microbiological quality of river Ganga, a life-sustaining surface water resource for large population of northern India, is adversely affected by several point and non-point sources of pollution. Further, untreated surface waters are consumed for drinking and various household tasks in India making the public vulnerable to water-borne diseases and outbreaks. Enterococci, the 'indicator' of water quality, correlates best with the incidence of gastrointestinal diseases as well as prevalence of other pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, this study aims to determine the distribution of species diversity, dissemination of antimicrobial-resistance and virulence-markers in enterococci with respect to rural-urban landscape along river Ganga in northern India.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19615089 PMCID: PMC2722665 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Quantitative enumeration and density estimation of enterococci in surface water samples (n = 15) collected from sites (n = 5) located on river Ganga (Kanpur city) in up-to-down-gradient fashion
| Sampling Site | CFU/100 ml water | MPN index/100 ml water (Lower 95% CI – Upper 95% CI)a | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site 1 | 32 (23 – 44) | 30 (10 – 110) | |
| Site 2 | 1130 (1034 – 1211) | 220 (100 – 580) | |
| Site 3 | 73000 (67532 – 76848) | 350 (160 – 820) | < 0.0001*** |
| Site 4 | 48000 (43978 – 51078) | 300 (100 – 1300) | |
| Site 5 | 820000 (782841 – 871978) | 1600 (600 – 5300) | |
| Controlc | ND | ND |
aLower 95% CI – Upper 95% CI are adopted from Table 9221.IV, Section 9221C. Estimation of Bacterial density, APHA (1998). bp-Value was calculated using chi square test for trend, χ2 = 1900; df = 1. cSterile Milli Q water used as control. ***Statistically significant at alpha < 0.05.
Abbreviations: ND, Not Detected.
Figure 1Map of study area/sampling sites in the landscape. Inset view simulates the complete 2510 km stretch of river Ganga from Himalaya to Bay of Bengal. Abbreviations: S#1, site 1: Bithoor (most upstream site); S#2, site 2: Bhairon ghat; S#3, site 3: Parmat ghat; S#4, site 4: sattichaura ghat or nana-rao ghat; S#5, site 5: jajmau (most downstream site). Arrows indicate the direction of surface water flow in the up-to-down-gradient fashion in the landscape. Topographic data based upon Survey of India map (adopted from http://www.ttkmaps.com).
Frequency of distribution of Enterococcus spp. diversity among sites (n = 5)
| Sampling Site | No. of isolates (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Total enterococci per site | ||||||
| site 1 | 5 (5.95) | 1 (1.19) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (7.14) | |
| site 2 | 9 (10.71) | 4 (4.76) | 4 (4.76) | 0 | 0 | 17 (20.24) | |
| site 3 | 12 (14.29) | 6 (7.14) | 0 | 1 (1.19) | 0 | 19 (22.62) | |
| site 4 | 12 (14.29) | 3 (3.57) | 3 (3.57) | 0 | 0 | 18 (21.43) | <0.0001*** |
| site 5 | 16 (19.05) | 6 (7.14) | 0 | 1 (1.19) | 1 (1.19) | 24 (28.57) | |
| 54 (64.29) | 20 (23.81) | 7 (8.33) | 2 (2.38) | 1 (1.19) | 84 (100) | ||
ap-Value was calculated using chi square test, χ2 = 100.4; df = 20. ***Statistically significant at alpha < 0.05.
Antimicrobial-resistance and virulence-markers investigated in each Enterococcus isolate on sites located in the up-to-down-gradient landscape
| Sampling site | No. of samples analyzed for antimicrobial susceptibility or virulence-marker/s (%) | Antimicrobial-resistance (AR) and Virulence-markers (VM) characterized per isolate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| site 1 | 6 (7.14) | AR: 5 (3 – 6) | 0.0156 |
| VM: 2 (1 – 3) | 0.0156 | ||
| site 2 | 17 (20.24) | AR: 5 (4 – 5) | 0.0001 |
| VM: 2 (1 – 2) | 0.0002 | ||
| site 3 | 19 (22.62) | AR: 7 (5 – 7) | < 0.0001 |
| VM: 1 (1 – 4) | < 0.0001 | ||
| site 4 | 18 (21.43) | AR: 5 (5 – 6) | 0.0001 |
| VM: 2 (1 – 2) | < 0.0001 | ||
| site 5 | 24 (28.57) | AR: 5 (5 – 6) | < 0.0001 |
| VM: 2 (2 – 3) | < 0.0001 |
aMedian and range are reported to match more consistently with the nonparametric statistical tests performed.
ap-Value was calculated using Wilcoxon rank sum test. *Statistically significant at alpha = 0.05.
Figure 2Distribution of single/multiple-antimicrobial-resistance in different . Abbreviations: A, ampicillin; P, penicillinG; M, methicillin; G, gentamicin; S, streptomycin (aminoglycoside); Va, vancomycin (glycopeptide); Te, teicoplanin; E, erythromycin; R, rifampicin; T, tetracycline; P-M, penicillinG-methicillin; A-P-Ox-M, ampicillin-penicillinG-oxacillin-methicillin (β-lactam); E-R, erythromycin-rifampicin (Macrolide-rifamycin); Va-G-S/Va-S/Va-G (glycopeptide-aminoglycoside); M-G-S/P-G-S (β-lactam-aminoglycoside); Va-M (glycopeptide-β-lactam); T-E-R (tetracycline-macrolide-rifamycin); E-R-Va (macrolide-rifamycin-glycopeptide); E-R-Va-M (macrolide-rifamycin-glycopeptide-β-lactam); E-R-M/E-R-A/E-R-P (macrolide-rifamycin-β-lactam); E-R-G/E-R-S (macrolide-rifamycin-aminoglycoside); E-R-S-M/E-R-G-M (macrolide-rifamycin-aminoglycoside-β-lactam). All antimicrobial combinations derived from aforementioned antimicrobial abbreviations.
Correlation observed for the prevalence of single/multiple-virulence-markers along with Enterococcus spp. diversity in the landscape.
| No. of isolates (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. No | Combination of virulence-marker/s | Total enterococci | Other | Spearman correlation ( | |||||
| 1 | 30(35.71) | 17(20.24) | 8(9.52) | 3(3.57) | 1(1.19) | 1(1.19) | 1 | 0.0083 | |
| 2 | 4(4.76) | 0 | 2(2.38) | 1(1.19) | 1(1.19) | 0 | 1 | 0.0083 | |
| 3 | 4(4.76) | 1(1.19) | 2(2.38) | 0 | 1(1.19) | 0 | 0.8208 | 0.0667 | |
| 4 | 2(2.38) | 1(1.19) | 0 | 0 | 1(1.19) | 0 | 0.4472 | 0.225 | |
| 5 | 22(26.19) | 17(20.24) | 2(2.38) | 3(3.57) | 0 | 0 | 0.9747 | 0.0083 | |
| 6 | 6(7.14) | 4(4.76) | 2(2.38) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8944 | 0.0417 | |
| 7 | 2(2.38) | 2(2.38) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7071 | 0.1167 | |
| 8 | 15(17.86) | 10(11.9) | 4(4.76) | 0 | 1(1.19) | 0 | 0.8208 | 0.0667 | |
ap-Value was calculated using Wilcoxon matched pair test. **/* p-value summary for significantly effective pairing.