Literature DB >> 19614939

Side-by-side comparison of areas with and without cellulite depressions using magnetic resonance imaging.

Doris Maria Hexsel1, Marcelo Abreu, Ticiana C Rodrigues, Mariana Soirefmann, Débora Zechmeister do Prado, Maryelle Moreira Lima Gamboa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cellulite is characterized by alterations in the relief of the skin surface. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recognized as a reliable technique for measuring adipose volume according to body site and for the visualization of the subcutaneous structures.
OBJECTIVE: To compare subcutaneous tissue in areas with and without cellulite on the buttocks of same subjects using a noninvasive technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty female patients with cellulite on the buttocks underwent MRI. An area with cellulite and another without cellulite on the contralateral buttock were selected. Two soft gelatin capsules of different sizes were used as skin markers to differentiate the areas with and without cellulite.
RESULTS: Fibrous septa were visualized in 96.7% of the area with cellulite depressions; most of them were ramified (73.3%) and presented a high-intensity signal on T2 images (70%). All fibrous septa found in the examined areas were perpendicular to the skin surface. The average fibrous septa thickness was 2.18 +/- 0.89 in the area with cellulite and 0.27 +/- 0.64 in the area without cellulite.
CONCLUSION: Results of the MRI analysis showed that cellulite depressions on the buttocks were significantly associated with the presence of underlying fibrous septa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19614939     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01260.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Cellulite].

Authors:  T M Proebstle
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Mixed-dimensional multi-scale poroelastic modeling of adipose tissue for subcutaneous injection.

Authors:  Yu Leng; Hao Wang; Mario de Lucio; Hector Gomez
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2022-09-03

Review 3.  Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision.

Authors:  Daniel P Friedmann; Garrett Lane Vick; Vineet Mishra
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2017-01-07

4.  Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization and Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Improving Skin Laxity and Cellulite Appearance.

Authors:  Gabriela Casabona; Gregório Pereira
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-07-25

5.  Treatment of Dimpling from Cellulite.

Authors:  Roberto Amore; Domenico Amuso; Vincenza Leonardi; Andrea Sbarbati; Giamaica Conti; Maria Albini; Francesco Leva; Ferdinando Terranova; Antonio Guida; Konstantinos Gkritzalas; Liya Gavashely; Roman Velichenko
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-05-18

6.  Cellulite Reduction by Modified Thai Herbal Compresses; A Randomized Double-Blind Trial.

Authors:  Ngamrayu Ngamdokmai; Neti Waranuch; Krongkarn Chootip; Katechan Jampachaisri; C Norman Scholfield; Kornkanok Ingkaninan
Journal:  J Evid Based Integr Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec

7.  Comparison of Cellulite Severity Scales and Imaging Methods.

Authors:  V Leroy Young; Barry E DiBernardo
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  Cellulite and focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy for non-invasive body contouring: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Karsten Knobloch; Beatrice Joest; Robert Krämer; Peter M Vogt
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2013-12-03

9.  Dietary Supplementation with Specific Collagen Peptides Has a Body Mass Index-Dependent Beneficial Effect on Cellulite Morphology.

Authors:  Michael Schunck; Vivian Zague; Steffen Oesser; Ehrhardt Proksch
Journal:  J Med Food       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.786

10.  Objective and subjective reduction of cellulite volume using a localized vibrational massage device in a 24-week randomized intra-individual single-blind regression study.

Authors:  T Sadowski; S Bielfeldt; K-P Wilhelm; S Sukopp; C Gordon
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.