Literature DB >> 19614747

Bar pressing for food: differential consequences of lesions to the anterior versus posterior pedunculopontine.

David I G Wilson1, Duncan A A MacLaren, Philip Winn.   

Abstract

The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) is in a key position to participate in operant reinforcement via its connections with the corticostriatal architecture and the medial reticular formation. Indeed, previous work has demonstrated that rats bearing lesions of the whole PPTg are impaired when learning to make two bar presses for amphetamine reinforcement. Anterior and posterior portions of the PPTg make different anatomical connections, including preferential projections by the anterior PPTg to substantia nigra pars compacta dopamine neurons and by the posterior PPTg to ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. We wanted to assess the effects of anterior and posterior PPTg ibotenate lesions on rats learning simple and more complex schedules of natural reinforcement. We trained rats with lesions to the anterior PPTg (n = 11) and the posterior PPTg (n = 5) [and appropriate controls (n = 15)] to bar press for food on a variety of fixed-ratio and variable-ratio reinforcement schedules and then during extinction. We found that posterior PPTg-lesioned rats bar pressed at lower rates, were slower to learn to bar press, and often had deficits characteristic of impaired learning and/or motivation. In contrast, anterior PPTg-lesioned rats learned to bar press for reinforcement at normal rates. However, they made errors of perseveration and anticipation throughout many schedules, and pressed at a higher rate than controls during extinction, deficits best characterized as reflecting disorganized response control. Together, these data suggest that the anterior PPTg and posterior PPTg (and their related circuits) contribute differently to reinforcement learning, incentive motivation, and response control, processes that are considered to malfunction in drug addiction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19614747     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06836.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  20 in total

Review 1.  Dichotomy between motor and cognitive functions of midbrain cholinergic neurons.

Authors:  Nadine K Gut; Juan Mena-Segovia
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.996

2.  Intra-ventral tegmental area microinjections of urotensin II modulate the effects of cocaine.

Authors:  L E Mueller; M A Kausch; T Markovic; D A A MacLaren; D M Dietz; J Park; S D Clark
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Toward sophisticated basal ganglia neuromodulation: Review on basal ganglia deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Claudio Da Cunha; Suelen L Boschen; Alexander Gómez-A; Erika K Ross; William S J Gibson; Hoon-Ki Min; Kendall H Lee; Charles D Blaha
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Structural and functional considerations of the cholinergic brainstem.

Authors:  Juan Mena-Segovia
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  The role of pedunculopontine nucleus in choice behavior under risk.

Authors:  Mona Leblond; Tatyana Sukharnikova; Chunxiu Yu; Mark A Rossi; Henry H Yin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Nicotine self-administered directly into the VTA by rats is weakly reinforcing but has strong reinforcement enhancing properties.

Authors:  Morag J Farquhar; Mary P Latimer; Philip Winn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Independent neural coding of reward and movement by pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus neurons in freely navigating rats.

Authors:  Alix B W Norton; Yong Sang Jo; Emily W Clark; Cortney A Taylor; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Pontomesencephalic Tegmental Afferents to VTA Non-dopamine Neurons Are Necessary for Appetitive Pavlovian Learning.

Authors:  Hau-Jie Yau; Dong V Wang; Jen-Hui Tsou; Yi-Fang Chuang; Billy T Chen; Karl Deisseroth; Satoshi Ikemoto; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions impair probabilistic reversal learning by reducing sensitivity to positive reward feedback.

Authors:  Anam Syed; Phillip M Baker; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Enhanced consumption of salient solutions following pedunculopontine tegmental lesions.

Authors:  D A A MacLaren; T Markovic; D Daniels; S D Clark
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.