Literature DB >> 19610442

Effects of pink bollworm resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis on phenoloxidase activity and susceptibility to entomopathogenic nematodes.

Aaron J Gassmann1, Jeffrey A Fabrick, Mark S Sisterson, Eugene R Hannon, S Patricia Stock, Yves Carrière, Bruce E Tabashnik.   

Abstract

Widespread planting of crops genetically engineered to produce insecticidal toxins from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) imposes selection on many key agricultural pests to evolve resistance to Bt. Fitness costs can slow the evolution of Bt resistance. We examined effects of entomopathogenic nematodes on fitness costs of Bt resistance in the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), a major pest of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., in the southwestern United States that is currently controlled by transgenic cotton that produces Bt toxin Cry1Ac. We tested whether the entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema riobrave Cabanillas, Poinar, and Raulston (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) affected fitness costs of resistance to Cry1Ac in two laboratory-selected hybrid strains of pink bollworm reared on non-Bt cotton bolls. The nematode S. riobrave imposed a recessive fitness cost for one strain, and H. bacteriophora imposed a fitness cost affecting heterozygous resistant individuals for the other strain. Activity of phenoloxidase, an important component of insects' immune response, did not differ between Bt-resistant and Bt-susceptible families. This suggests phenoloxidase does not affect susceptibility to entomopathogenic nematodes in Bt-resistant pink bollworm. Additionally, phenoloxidase activity does not contribute to Bt resistance, as has been found in some species. We conclude that other mechanisms cause higher nematode-imposed mortality for pink bollworm with Bt resistance genes. Incorporation of nematode-imposed fitness costs into a spatially explicit simulation model suggests that entomopathogenic nematodes in non-Bt refuges could delay resistance by pink bollworm to Bt cotton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19610442     DOI: 10.1603/029.102.0348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  6 in total

1.  Developmental penalties associated with inducible tolerance in Helicoverpa armigera to insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis.

Authors:  Mahbub Rahman; Richard Glatz; Rick Roush; Otto Schmidt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Response Mechanisms of Invertebrates to Bacillus thuringiensis and Its Pesticidal Proteins.

Authors:  Daniel Pinos; Ascensión Andrés-Garrido; Juan Ferré; Patricia Hernández-Martínez
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Analysis of sustainable pest control using a pesticide and a screened refuge.

Authors:  John Ringland; Prasanth George
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Comparative evaluation of phenoloxidase activity in different larval stages of four lepidopteran pests after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis.

Authors:  J A Valadez-Lira; J M Alcocer-Gonzalez; G Damas; G Nuñez-Mejía; B Oppert; C Rodriguez-Padilla; P Tamez-Guerra
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.857

5.  Type of fitness cost influences the rate of evolution of resistance to transgenic Bt crops.

Authors:  Sean C Hackett; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.528

6.  Using a Two-Sex Life Table Tool to Calculate the Fitness of Orius strigicollis as a Predator of Pectinophora gossypiella.

Authors:  Shahzaib Ali; Sizhe Li; Waqar Jaleel; Muhammad Musa Khan; Jintao Wang; Xingmiao Zhou
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.769

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.