Literature DB >> 19608845

A comparison of a single or triple injection technique for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Marie-Christine Desgagnés1, Simon Lévesque, Nicolas Dion, Marie-Josée Nadeau, Dany Coté, Jean Brassard, Pierre C Nicole, Alexis F Turgeon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Good success rates have been reported with ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block using one or multiple injections of local anesthetic. We hypothesized that a separate injection of local anesthetics on each cord enhances the onset of complete sensory block. We designed this prospective randomized study to compare the rate of complete sensory block using one or three injections of local anesthetic.
METHODS: Patients scheduled for hand, wrist, or elbow surgery were included in this study. All blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance. In Group S (single injection), 30 mL of mepivacaine 1.5% was injected posterior to the axillary artery. In Group T (triple injections), 10 mL of mepivacaine 1.5% was injected on the posterior, medial, and lateral aspects of the axillary artery. Sensory block was evaluated every 3 min up to 30 min. The primary end point was the rate of complete sensory block at 15 min.
RESULTS: Forty-nine and 51 patients were randomized in Groups S and T, respectively. The rate of complete sensory block was comparable at 15 min (Group S: 84%, Group T: 78%, P = 0.61) and at each time interval up to 30 min. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complications between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The success rate and the onset of complete sensory block after ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block are not enhanced by a triple injection of local anesthetic compared with a single injection posterior to the axillary artery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19608845     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aa308f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

1.  To what extent can local anesthetics be reduced for infraclavicular block with ultrasound guidance?

Authors:  G Eren; E Altun; Y Pektas; Y Polat; H Cetingok; G Demir; D Bilgi; Y Tekdos; M Dogan
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Randomized comparative study between two different techniques of intercostobrachial nerve block together with brachial plexus block during superficialization of arteriovenous fistula.

Authors:  Moustafa Abdelaziz Moustafa; Alaa A Kandeel
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Low-Volume Brachial Plexus Block Providing Surgical Anesthesia for Distal Arm Surgery Comparing Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular, and Axillary Approach: A Randomized Observer Blind Trial.

Authors:  Mojgan Vazin; Kenneth Jensen; Danja L Kristensen; Mathias Hjort; Katrine Tanggaard; Manoj K Karmakar; Thomas F Bendtsen; Jens Børglum
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Peripheral Nerve Injury After Upper-Extremity Surgery Performed Under Regional Anesthesia: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Max Lester Silverstein; Ruth Tevlin; Kenneth Elliott Higgins; Rachel Pedreira; Catherine Curtin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2022-06-04

5.  [The need for supplemental blocks in single versus triple injections in infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks with a medial approach: a clinical and anatomic study].

Authors:  Hande G Aytuluk; Tuncay Colak
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-02-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.