Literature DB >> 19608812

Lack of effect of aprepitant or its prodrug fosaprepitant on QTc intervals in healthy subjects.

Thomas C Marbury1, Bo Jin, Deborah Panebianco, M Gail Murphy, Hong Sun, Judith K Evans, Tae H Han, Marvin L Constanzer, James Dru, Craig R Shadle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A single 115-mg dose of fosaprepitant, the IV prodrug of the NK(1) receptor antagonist aprepitant, is bioequivalent to a 125-mg dose of oral aprepitant. Thus far, fosaprepitant/aprepitant has not shown a meaningful effect on QTc intervals; in this study, we sought to confirm these findings.
METHODS: This double-blind, active-controlled, randomized, three-treatment, three-period, crossover study in healthy young subjects evaluated the effect of a 200-mg dose of fosaprepitant on QTc prolongation. In each period, subjects received 400 mg moxifloxacin per os, 200 mg fosaprepitant IV, or placebo in randomized sequence. The effect of fosaprepitant on QTc interval was assessed by 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). The baseline value for QTc interval for each subject during each period was defined as the average of five replicate baseline QTc intervals extracted from predose ECGs. ECGs were performed at predose, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 min; and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 h postinfusion. Values for individual QTc change from baseline were evaluated in a repeated-measures mixed model appropriate for a crossover design. A two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the true difference in QTc interval change from baseline at each timepoint was calculated for fosaprepitant versus placebo and for moxifloxacin versus placebo.
RESULTS: After fosaprepitant 200-mg administration, the mean (95% CI) QTc interval change from baseline at T(max) was -1.45 (-4.67 to 1.77) ms, and the placebo-corrected mean (90% CI) QTc interval change from baseline was -1.37 (-4.78 to 2.05) ms. Neither was statistically significant at alpha = 0.05. After 400 mg moxifloxacin administration, the mean (95% CI) QTc interval change from baseline at 2 h was 9.71 (6.49-12.93) ms, and the placebo-corrected mean (90% CI) QTc interval change from baseline at moxifloxacin T(max) was 10.50 (7.09-13.92) ms. Both were statistically significant at alpha = 0.05. The maximum aprepitant concentration after fosaprepitant 200 mg administration was 6300 ng/mL (approximately twofold, fourfold, and ninefold higher than that observed historically with fosaprepitant 115 mg [3095 ng/mL], aprepitant 125 mg [1600 ng/mL], and aprepitant 40 mg [675 ng/mL]).
CONCLUSIONS: In subjects receiving fosaprepitant 200 mg, no clinically meaningful increases in QTc were seen at any timepoint, whereas after moxifloxacin 400 mg, increases were observed at the approximate T(max) of moxifloxacin and additional timepoints. The lack of QTc increase at this high dose of fosaprepitant and resulting aprepitant plasma exposures support the expectation that clinical doses of fosaprepitant or aprepitant will not be associated with significant QTc prolongation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19608812     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ac1066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation of fosaprepitant dimeglumine.

Authors:  Francheska Colon-Gonzalez; Walter K Kraft
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.481

2.  Highly frequent and enhanced injection site reaction induced by peripheral venous injection of fosaprepitant in anthracycline-treated patients.

Authors:  Yumiko Sato; Masahiro Kondo; Atsushi Inagaki; Hirokazu Komatsu; Chika Okada; Kumi Naruse; Tomoyo Sahashi; Junko Kuroda; Hiroka Ogura; Shiori Uegaki; Tatsuya Yoshida; Yoshinori Mori; Hiroo Sawada; Shoichi Watanabe; Hiroshi Sugiura; Yumi Endo; Nobuyasu Yoshimoto; Tatsuya Toyama; Shinsuke Iida; Koichi Yamada; Kazunori Kimura; Atsushi Wakita
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 3.  PONV management in patients with QTc prolongation on the EKG.

Authors:  S Soghomonyan; N Stoicea; W Ackermann; S P Bhandary
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 4.  Neurokinin-1 Antagonists for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

Authors:  Zhaosheng Jin; Neil Daksla; Tong J Gan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of single-dose fosaprepitant regimen for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Luigi Celio; Francesca Ricchini; Filippo De Braud
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Effects of combined netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA), a cancer supportive care antiemetic, on the ECG of healthy subjects: an ICH E14 thorough QT trial.

Authors:  Tulla Spinelli; Cecilia Moresino; Sybille Baumann; Wolfgang Timmer; Armin Schultz
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-07-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.