Literature DB >> 19608288

Validation of the Chinese-Canadian study of health and aging clinical frailty scale (CSHA-CFS) telephone version.

Ding-Cheng Derrick Chan1, Hsiao-Hui Tsou, Chin-Ying Chen, Ching-Yu Chen.   

Abstract

This was a cross-sectional validation study of the Chinese-Canadian study of health and aging clinical frailty scale telephone version (CSHA-CFS TV). The study pool consisted of 67 patients of outpatient clinics at a tertiary medical center in Taipei, Taiwan. They were enrolled in the program comprehensive geriatric assessment and the frailty study of elderly patients (CGAFSEP). The Chinese-Canadian study of health and aging clinical frailty scale physician version (CSHA-CFS PV) is a 7-point scale assigned after comprehensive geriatric assessments. Higher score indicates frailer status. The Chinese-Canadian study of health and aging clinical frailty scale (CSHA-CFS) telephone version (TV) included 17 questions adapted from the physician version. Two trained research assistants conducted the telephone interviews. Administration time was <3 min. Standard reliability and validity measures were applied. Three-fifths of the subjects were older than 75 years, and half of them were females. Inter-rater reliability was achieved with weighted kappa of 0.684, (p=0.002) between first 20 ratings from 2 interviewers. Criterion validity was achieved with weighted kappa of 0.689 (p<0.0001) and Kendal's tau of 0.612 (p<0.0001) between the TV and the PV scores. Divergent validity was demonstrated with significant correlation but only fair agreements comparing both TV and PV scores with the cardiovascular health survey (CHS) phenotypic definition of frailty. One could conclude that the CSHA-CFS TV appears to be a quick, reliable, and valid frailty screening instrument for community-dwelling elderly. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19608288     DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0167-4943            Impact factor:   3.250


  28 in total

1.  Performance of Edmonton Frail Scale on frailty assessment: its association with multi-dimensional geriatric conditions assessed with specific screening tools.

Authors:  Simone Perna; Matthew D'Arcy Francis; Chiara Bologna; Francesca Moncaglieri; Antonella Riva; Paolo Morazzoni; Pietro Allegrini; Antonio Isu; Beatrice Vigo; Fabio Guerriero; Mariangela Rondanelli
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Frailty and mortality in dialysis: evaluation of a clinical frailty scale.

Authors:  Talal A Alfaadhel; Steven D Soroka; Bryce A Kiberd; David Landry; Paige Moorhouse; Karthik K Tennankore
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Validation of clinical frailty scale in Chinese translation.

Authors:  Yi-Chun Chou; Hsiao-Hui Tsou; Ding-Cheng Derrick Chan; Chiung-Jung Wen; Feng-Ping Lu; Kun-Pei Lin; Meng-Chen Wu; Yung-Ming Chen; Jen-Hau Chen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.070

4.  The 2019-2020 Novel Coronavirus (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) Pandemic: A Joint American College of Academic International Medicine-World Academic Council of Emergency Medicine Multidisciplinary COVID-19 Working Group Consensus Paper.

Authors:  Stanislaw P Stawicki; Rebecca Jeanmonod; Andrew C Miller; Lorenzo Paladino; David F Gaieski; Anna Q Yaffee; Annelies De Wulf; Joydeep Grover; Thomas J Papadimos; Christina Bloem; Sagar C Galwankar; Vivek Chauhan; Michael S Firstenberg; Salvatore Di Somma; Donald Jeanmonod; Sona M Garg; Veronica Tucci; Harry L Anderson; Lateef Fatimah; Tamara J Worlton; Siddharth P Dubhashi; Krystal S Glaze; Sagar Sinha; Ijeoma Nnodim Opara; Vikas Yellapu; Dhanashree Kelkar; Ayman El-Menyar; Vimal Krishnan; S Venkataramanaiah; Yan Leyfman; Hassan Ali Saoud Al Thani; Prabath Wb Nanayakkara; Sudip Nanda; Eric Cioè-Peña; Indrani Sardesai; Shruti Chandra; Aruna Munasinghe; Vibha Dutta; Silvana Teixeira Dal Ponte; Ricardo Izurieta; Juan A Asensio; Manish Garg
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-22

Review 5.  Frailty in the critically ill: a novel concept.

Authors:  Robert C McDermid; Henry T Stelfox; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  The effect of a virtual ward program on emergency services utilization and quality of life in frail elderly patients after discharge: a pilot study.

Authors:  Doris Y P Leung; Diana Tze-Fan Lee; Iris F K Lee; Lai-Wah Lam; Susanna W Y Lee; May W M Chan; Yin-Ming Lam; Siu-Hung Leung; Pui-Chi Chiu; Nelly K F Ho; Ming-Fai Ip; May M Y Hui
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Reliability, Validity, and Feasibility of the Frail-VIG Index.

Authors:  Anna Torné; Emma Puigoriol; Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo; Juan-José Zamora-Sánchez; Sebastià Santaeugènia; Jordi Amblàs-Novellas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Frailty Pathogenesis, Assessment, and Management in Older Adults With COVID-19.

Authors:  Quan She; Bo Chen; Wen Liu; Min Li; Weihong Zhao; Jianqing Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-06

9.  A pilot randomized controlled trial to improve geriatric frailty.

Authors:  Ding-Cheng Derrick Chan; Hsiao-Hui Tsou; Rong-Sen Yang; Jau-Yih Tsauo; Ching-Yu Chen; Chao Agnes Hsiung; Ken N Kuo
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 10.  Measures of frailty in population-based studies: an overview.

Authors:  Kim Bouillon; Mika Kivimaki; Mark Hamer; Severine Sabia; Eleonor I Fransson; Archana Singh-Manoux; Catharine R Gale; G David Batty
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.