Literature DB >> 19608168

Single and multidose pharmacokinetic study of a vaginal micronized progesterone insert (Endometrin) compared with vaginal gel in healthy reproductive-aged female subjects.

Emily J Blake1, Paul M Norris, Sally Faith Dorfman, James Longstreth, Vladimir I Yankov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacokinetic profiles of two times a day and three times a day dosage regimens of Endometrin, a micronized progesterone vaginal insert for luteal support in assisted reproductive technology, compared with a gel.
DESIGN: A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-day, and multiple-day (5 days) parallel design pharmacokinetic study.
SETTING: University clinical research unit. PATIENT(S): Three groups of six healthy subjects, ages 18 to 40 years. INTERVENTION(S): Endometrin vaginal inserts two times a day or three times a day, or gel daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pharmacokinetic profiles. RESULT(S): Progesterone serum concentrations increased rapidly following administration of Endometrin vaginal insert, producing higher peak concentrations (Cmax) and clearing faster than gel. On the single day of dosing, mean Cmax was 17.0+/-2.7 ng/mL in the two times a day group, 19.8+/-2.9 ng/mL in the three times a day group, and 6.82+/-1.69 ng/mL in the gel group. Endometrin treatments reached steady state within the first 2 days (24-36 hours), much more rapidly than the gel, which had not reached steady state by 5 days. At 5 days, the Endometrin treatments produced sustained progesterone concentrations exceeding 10 mg/mL across 24 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: Endometrin vaginal inserts reached higher Cmax, produced greater systemic exposure (area under the curve 0-24), achieved steady state more rapidly, and cleared more rapidly after termination of therapy than the comparator. Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19608168     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  Has ART Finally Got a Patient-Friendly Progesterone?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

3.  Pharmacokinetics of vaginal progesterone in pregnancy.

Authors:  Rupsa C Boelig; Athena F Zuppa; Walter K Kraft; Steve Caritis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse.

Authors:  Lingling Salang; Danielle M Teixeira; Ivan Solà; Jen Sothornwit; Wellington P Martins; Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-24

5.  Low Luteal Serum Progesterone Levels Are Associated With Lower Ongoing Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in ART: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Noemie Ranisavljevic; Stephanie Huberlant; Marie Montagut; Pierre-Marie Alonzo; Bernadette Darné; Solène Languille; Tal Anahory; Isabelle Cédrin-Durnerin
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.055

6.  A questionnaire-based audit to assess overall experience and convenience among patients using vaginal progesterone tablets (Lutigest®) for luteal phase support during IVF treatment.

Authors:  Polly Heine; Laura Sellar; Sue Whitten; Priti Bajaj
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2017-12-08

7.  Pharmacokinetic Properties of Three Forms of Vaginal Progesterone Administered in Either Single Or Multiple Dose Regimen in Healthy Post-menopausal Chinese Women.

Authors:  Guolan Wu; Junchun Chen; Xingjiang Hu; Huili Zhou; Jian Liu; Duo Lv; Lihua Wu; Jianzhong Shentu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support following blastocyst cryopreserved single embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer B Bakkensen; Catherine Racowsky; Ann M Thomas; Andrea Lanes; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-07-01

9.  Daytime Variation in Serum Progesterone During the Mid-Luteal Phase in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization Treatment.

Authors:  Lise Haaber Thomsen; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Claus Yding Andersen; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Reiko Shiba; Masayuki Kinutani; Shinichiro Okano; Reo Kawano; Yuko Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.