Literature DB >> 19608150

The perils of commercially driven surgical innovation.

L Lewis Wall1, Douglas Brown.   

Abstract

The practice of gynecological surgery is being reshaped by commercial interests that are promoting the use of trochar-and-mesh surgical kits for the treatment of stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In this article, we review the recent history of these surgical innovations and discuss the implications of changes in surgical practice that are driven by commercial interests of this kind. We situate this phenomenon within the general "life cycle" of surgical innovation and point out the dangers inherent in the adoption of new procedures without adequate evidence to support their safety and efficacy. We highlight the ethical responsibilities surgeons and their professional organizations have in making sure such innovations are safe and effective before they come into widespread use. Finally, we offer some policy suggestions to ensure that this process has proper oversight. 2010. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19608150     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature.

Authors:  E J Stanford; A Cassidenti; M D Moen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Cross-disciplinary research in cancer: an opportunity to narrow the knowledge-practice gap.

Authors:  R Urquhart; E Grunfeld; L Jackson; J Sargeant; G A Porter
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  [Complications associated with plastic meshes and slings. A situation like in the US?].

Authors:  E Petri
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Reasonable people disagree: lessons learned from the sling and mesh story.

Authors:  Bob L Shull
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Global convergence on the bioethics of surgical implants.

Authors:  Alberto Garcia; Dominique J Monlezun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Pacemakers are not vacuum cleaners Towards new guidelines for the introduction of novel medical devices in pelvic floor surgery.

Authors:  J Deprest; D De Ridder
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2011

Review 7.  Surgical innovation: the ethical agenda: A systematic review.

Authors:  Marike L Broekman; Michelle E Carrière; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Plastic Surgeons' Perceptions of Financial Conflicts of Interest and the Sunshine Act.

Authors:  Taylor E Purvis; Joseph Lopez; Jacqueline Milton; James W May; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-04-04

9.  Decisions to use surgical mesh in operations for pelvic organ prolapse: a question of geography?

Authors:  Emil Karl Nüssler; Emil Nüssler; Jacob Kjær Eskildsen; Mats Löfgren
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.