| Literature DB >> 19607707 |
Aníbal E Carbajo1, Carolina Vera, Paula Lm González.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oligoryzomys longicaudatus (colilargo) is the rodent responsible for hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in Argentine Patagonia. In past decades (1967-1998), trends of precipitation reduction and surface air temperature increase have been observed in western Patagonia. We explore how the potential distribution of the hantavirus reservoir would change under different climate change scenarios based on the observed trends.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19607707 PMCID: PMC2721831 DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Health Geogr ISSN: 1476-072X Impact factor: 3.918
Figure 1Study area. Study area (rectangle), showing Argentine Patagonia and Oligoryzomys longicaudatus field records. Dashed lined rectangles and numbers indicate the subareas used to evaluate the changes in O. longicaudatus presence probability (see table 1).
Figure 2Temperature and precipitation trends. Change in mean air temperature (a) and cumulated precipitation (b) observed between 1967 and 1998 in Argentine Patagonia. Time series of temperature (annual average of monthly means) and precipitation (annual average of monthly accumulated rainfall) for the locality indicated in the maps by the red triangle (c).
Figure 3. Oligoryzomys longicaudatus presence probability change according to temperature and precipitation change scenarios. The maps show the difference between scenarios probability and the actual presence probability. a- Scenario 1, temperature change alone; b- Scenario 2, precipitation change alone; c- Scenario 3, temperature and precipitation change; d- Scenario 4, temperature and precipitation change twofold. Positive values indicate an increase in presence probability.
Presence probability comparison. Differences in Oligoryzomys longicaudatus presence probability between four scenarios of climate change and actual conditions.
| Original model presence probability | Sub area | Scenario | |||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1.00 | 11 | 0.00 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.87** |
| 0.08 | 22 | -0.01 | -0.04 | -0.06 | -0.08* |
| 0.81 | 33 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.33** |
| 0.50 | 44 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | -0.50** |
| 0.54 | 53 | 0.00 | -0.14 | -0.07 | 0.03 |
| 0.81 | 61 | -0.05 | -0.43** | -0.40** | -0.09 |
| 1.00 | 73 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.17* |
| 0.69 | 84 | 0.04 | -0.07 | -0.06 | -0.69** |
| 0.63 | 93 | -0.16 | -0.16 | -0.16 | 0.06 |
| 0.33 | 102 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.05 | -0.15* |
1Areas where HPS cases have occurred
2No HPS cases, no rodent
3No HPS cases, rodent widespread
4No HPS cases, rodent scarce.
Positive values indicate an increase in presence probability. The presence probability according to the original model is shown in the first column (probabilities below 0.5 coincide with rodent actual absence). The subareas numbers indicate the corresponding areas in Figure 1. Scenario 1, temperature change alone (see text for details); Scenario 2 precipitation change; Scenario 3 temperature and precipitation change; Scenario 4 temperature and precipitation change twofold. Significant differences are indicated by * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.