Literature DB >> 1960652

Moral affect: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

J P Tangney1.   

Abstract

The relations among 3 moral affective personality characteristics--shame-proneness, guilt-proneness, and empathic responsiveness--were examined in 4 independent studies of undergraduates. Results indicate that shame and guilt are distinct affective experiences that have important and quite different implications in the interpersonal realm. There was a substantial positive correlation between shame-proneness and guilt-proneness. Nonetheless, as predicted, other-oriented empathic responsiveness was negatively related to proneness to shame but positively correlated with proneness to guilt. In contrast, an index of more self-oriented personal distress was positively linked to shame-proneness. Taken together, these results add a new dimension to the ugliness of shame but suggest that guilt may not be that bad after all, at least in the interpersonal domain.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1960652     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.4.598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  42 in total

Review 1.  Definition and measurement of guilt: Implications for clinical research and practice.

Authors:  Carlos Tilghman-Osborne; David A Cole; Julia W Felton
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-03-30

2.  Untangling developmental relations between depressed mood and delinquency in male adolescents.

Authors:  Jennifer M Beyers; Rolf Loeber
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2003-06

3.  Effects of social context and predictive relevance on action outcome monitoring.

Authors:  Leonie Koban; Gilles Pourtois; Benoit Bediou; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Moral emotions and moral behavior.

Authors:  June Price Tangney; Jeff Stuewig; Debra J Mashek
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Young children's adjustment as a function of maltreatment, shame, and anger.

Authors:  David S Bennett; Margaret Wolan Sullivan; Michael Lewis
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2005-11

6.  Self-Focused Emotions and Ethical Decision-Making: Comparing the Effects of Regulated and Unregulated Guilt, Shame, and Embarrassment.

Authors:  Cory Higgs; Tristan McIntosh; Shane Connelly; Michael Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Children's proneness to shame and guilt predict risky and illegal behaviors in young adulthood.

Authors:  Jeffrey Stuewig; June P Tangney; Stephanie Kendall; Johanna B Folk; Candace Reinsmith Meyer; Ronda L Dearing
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2015-04

8.  Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures.

Authors:  Daniel Sznycer; John Tooby; Leda Cosmides; Roni Porat; Shaul Shalvi; Eran Halperin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Shaming, Blaming, and Maiming: Functional Links Among the Moral Emotions, Externalization of Blame, and Aggression.

Authors:  Jeffrey Stuewig; June P Tangney; Caron Heigel; Laura Harty; Laura McCloskey
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2010-02-01

10.  When does Spousal Social Control Provoke Negative Reactions in the Context of Chronic Illness?: The Pivotal Role of Patients' Expectations.

Authors:  Karen S Rook; Kristin J August; Mary Ann Parris Stephens; Melissa M Franks
Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat       Date:  2011-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.